Skip to Content
Cyber and Privacy Risk and Insurance

New York Responsible AI Safety and Education Act: Scope, Definitions, Transparency, and Disclosure

Melissa Krasnow | August 14, 2026

On This Page
white courthouse icon in front of a blurred binary code New York City skyline

The New York Responsible Artificial Intelligence Safety and Education (RAISE) Act takes effect on January 1, 2027. This article discusses the New York RAISE Act's scope, definitions, transparency requirements, and large frontier developer disclosure.

Scope of NY RAISE Act

The New York RAISE Act shall only apply to frontier models that are developed, deployed, or operating in whole or in part in New York. The New York RAISE Act addresses requirements for large frontier developers and frontier developers.

NY RAISE Act Definitions

Frontier model means a foundation model that was trained using a quantity of computing power greater than 10^26 integer or floating-point operations. The quantity of computing power described in the immediately preceding sentence shall include computing for the original training run and for any subsequent fine-tuning, reinforcement learning, or other material modifications the developer applies to a preceding foundation model.

Foundation model means an AI model that is all of the following.

  • Trained on a broad data set;
  • Designed for generality of output; and
  • Adaptable to a wide range of distinctive tasks.

Artificial intelligence model means an engineered or machine-based system that varies in its level of autonomy and that can, for explicit or implicit objectives, infer from the input it receives how to generate outputs that can influence physical or virtual environments.

Deploy means to make a frontier model available to a third party for use, modification, copying, or combination with other software, excluding making a frontier model available to a third party for the primary purpose of developing or evaluating the frontier model. Frontier developer means a person who has trained, or initiated the training of, a frontier model, with respect to which the person has used, or intends to use, at least as much computing power to train the frontier model as would meet the technical specifications for a frontier model hereunder.

Person means an individual, proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, syndicate, business trust, company, corporation, limited liability company, association, committee, or any other nongovernmental organization or group of persons acting in concert.

Large frontier developer means a frontier developer that together with its affiliates collectively had annual gross revenues in excess of $500 million in the preceding calendar year.

Affiliate means a person controlling, controlled by, or under common control with a specified person, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries.

Catastrophic risk means a foreseeable and material risk that a frontier developer's development, storage, use, or deployment of a frontier model will materially contribute to the death of, or serious injury to, more than 50 people or more than $1 billion in damage to, or loss of, property arising from a single incident involving a frontier model doing any of the following.

  • Providing expert-level assistance in the creation or release of a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapon;
  • Engaging in conduct with no meaningful human oversight, intervention, or supervision that is either a cyberattack or, if the conduct had been committed by a human, would constitute the crime of murder, assault, extortion, or theft, including theft by false pretense; or
  • Evading the control of its frontier developer or user.

Catastrophic risk does not include a foreseeable and material risk from any of the following.

  • Information that a frontier model outputs if the information is otherwise publicly accessible in a substantially similar form from a source other than a foundation model;
  • Lawful activity of the federal government; or
  • Harm caused by a frontier model in combination with other software if the frontier model did not materially contribute to the harm.

Property means tangible or intangible property.

Frontier AI framework means documented technical and organizational protocols to manage, assess, and mitigate catastrophic risks.

Model weight means a numerical parameter in a frontier model that is adjusted through training and that helps determine how inputs are transformed into outputs.

Critical safety incident means any of the following.

  • Unauthorized access to, modification of, or exfiltration of the model weights of a frontier model that results in death or bodily injury;
  • Harm resulting from the materialization of a catastrophic risk;
  • Loss of control of a frontier model causing death or bodily injury; or
  • A frontier model that uses deceptive techniques against the frontier developer to subvert the controls or monitoring of its frontier developer outside of the context of an evaluation designed to elicit this behavior and in a manner that demonstrates materially increased catastrophic risk.

Office means an office within the New York department of financial services, which shall report to the New York superintendent of financial services and is tasked with implementation of the New York RAISE Act. The office is authorized to adopt rules and regulations to implement the provisions of the New York RAISE Act as needed.

NY RAISE Act Transparency Requirements

Transparency Report

Before, or concurrently with, deploying a new frontier model or a substantially modified version of an existing frontier model, a frontier developer shall clearly and conspicuously publish on its internet website a transparency report containing all of the following.

  • The internet website of the frontier developer;
  • A mechanism that enables a natural person to communicate with the frontier developer;
  • The release date of the frontier model;
  • The languages supported by the frontier model;
  • The modalities of output supported by the frontier model;
  • The intended uses of the frontier model; and
  • Any generally applicable restrictions or conditions on uses of the frontier model.

In addition to the immediately preceding paragraph, a large frontier developer shall include in such transparency report summaries of all of the following.

  • Assessments of catastrophic risks from the frontier model conducted pursuant to the large frontier developer's frontier AI framework (collectively, Catastrophic Risk Assessments);
  • The results of the Catastrophic Risk Assessments;
  • The extent to which third-party evaluators were involved; and
  • Other steps taken to fulfill the requirements of the frontier AI framework with respect to the frontier model.

A frontier developer that publishes the information described in the immediately preceding two paragraphs as part of a larger document, including a system card or model card, shall be deemed in compliance therewith.

Large Frontier Developer Frontier AI Framework

A large frontier developer shall write, implement, comply with, and clearly and conspicuously publish on its internet website a frontier AI framework that applies to the large frontier developer's frontier models and describes in detail how the large frontier developer handles all of the following.

  • Incorporating national standards, international standards, and industry consensus best practices into its frontier AI framework;
  • Defining and assessing thresholds used by the large frontier developer to identify and assess whether a frontier model has capabilities that could pose a catastrophic risk, which may include multiple-tiered thresholds (collectively, Threshold Assessments);
  • Applying mitigations to address the potential for catastrophic risks based on the results of the Threshold Assessments;
  • Reviewing assessments and adequacy of mitigations as part of the decision to deploy a frontier model or use it extensively internally;
  • Using third parties to assess the potential for catastrophic risks and the effectiveness of mitigations of catastrophic risks;
  • Revisiting and updating the frontier AI framework, including any criteria that trigger updates and how the large frontier developer determines when its frontier models are substantially modified enough to require disclosures with respect to the transparency report;
  • Cyber-security practices to secure unreleased model weights from unauthorized modification or transfer by internal or external parties;
  • Identifying and responding to critical safety incidents;
  • Instituting internal governance practices to ensure implementation of these processes; and
  • Assessing and managing catastrophic risk resulting from the internal use of its frontier models, including risks resulting from a frontier model circumventing oversight mechanisms.

A large frontier developer shall review and, as appropriate, update its frontier AI framework at least once per year. If a large frontier developer makes a material modification to its frontier AI framework, the large frontier developer shall clearly and conspicuously publish the modified frontier AI framework and a justification for that modification within 30 days.

No Materially False or Misleading Catastrophic Risk Statement

A frontier developer shall not make a materially false or misleading statement about catastrophic risk from its frontier models or its management of catastrophic risk. A large frontier developer shall not make a materially false or misleading statement about its implementation of, or compliance with, its frontier AI framework. This paragraph shall not apply to a statement that was made in good faith and was reasonable under the circumstances.

Redaction and Retention

When a frontier developer publishes documents to comply with the foregoing transparency requirements, such frontier developer may make redactions to such documents that are necessary to protect such frontier developer's trade secrets, such frontier developer's cyber security, public safety, or the national security of the US or to comply with any federal or state law. If a frontier developer redacts information in a document pursuant hereto, such frontier developer shall describe the character and justification of such redaction in any published version of such document to the extent permitted by the concerns that justify redaction and shall retain the unredacted information for 5 years.

Large Frontier Developer Disclosure

Except as otherwise provided herein, no large frontier developer may develop, deploy, or operate a frontier model, in whole or in part, in New York without having a current disclosure statement filed with the office and paying the required share. The disclosure statement shall be filed in the form and the manner prescribed by the office and shall contain all the information required by the office. It shall be renewed every 2 years, whenever ownership of the frontier model is transferred or whenever there is a material change to the information reported in the previously filed disclosure statement, whichever occurs earlier. Such disclosure statement shall identify the following.

  • The identity of the large frontier developer and all names under which such large frontier developer conducts business;
  • The address of the principal place of business and the address of each office it maintains in New York;
  • In the event such large frontier developer or the ultimate parent of such large frontier developer is a privately or closely held company, a list of all persons or entities that beneficially own a 5 percent or greater interest in such large frontier developer at the time of the filing of the disclosure statement and a list of persons who formerly beneficially owned a 5 percent or greater interest in such owner or its predecessors in the preceding 5 years. In the event such owner or the ultimate parent is a publicly traded company, such owner shall file a list of all persons or entities that beneficially own a 50 percent or greater interest in the large frontier developer at the time of registration; and
  • The name and contact information of a point of contact, secondary contact, and tertiary contact for such large frontier developer. Such point of contact shall be responsible for receiving inquiries relating to the New York RAISE Act from the office or other governmental entities.

Large frontier developers shall be assessed in pro rata shares by the New York Department of Financial Services to defray the operating expenses, including all direct and indirect costs, of administering the obligations imposed by the New York RAISE Act.

If any person develops, deploys, or operates a large frontier model in part in New York without a current disclosure filed with the office as required hereby, submits false information in its disclosure, or fails to timely pay any assessment required by this the New York RAISE Act, in addition to any other penalty or liability that may be imposed under the New York RAISE Act, the office may, after notice and hearing, levy the following civil penalties, fees, and costs.

  • A civil penalty of $1,000 for each day the entity fails to file a disclosure as required hereby or fails to correct false information; and
  • An amount equal to the assessments owed.

The office shall maintain and publish a list of large frontier developers who have filed disclosure statements; however, such publication shall not include contact information.


Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.