Skip to Content

facultative reinsurance FAC

Traditional facultative reinsurance is a form of reinsurance whereby each exposure the ceding company wishes to reinsure is offered to the reinsurer and is contained in a single transaction. The submission, acceptance, and resulting agreement is required on each individual risk or portion of an individual risk that the ceding company seeks to reinsure. That is, the ceding company negotiates an individual reinsurance agreement for every policy it will reinsure. However, the reinsurer is not obliged to accept every or any submission.

On This Page

facultative reinsurance FAC

Traditional facultative reinsurance is a form of reinsurance whereby each exposure the ceding company wishes to reinsure is offered to the reinsurer and is contained in a single transaction. The submission, acceptance, and resulting agreement is required on each individual risk or portion of an individual risk that the ceding company seeks to reinsure. That is, the ceding company negotiates an individual reinsurance agreement for every policy it will reinsure. However, the reinsurer is not obliged to accept every or any submission.


Understanding Facultative Reinsurance

Facultative reinsurance stands out for its specificity and individual approach to reinsurance agreements. Unlike treaty reinsurance, which covers a range of policies under a single contract, facultative reinsurance focuses on individual or singular risks or portions of those specific risks. This form of reinsurance is especially relevant for high-value or unusual risks that do not fit neatly into the broader categories covered by treaty agreements.

In facultative reinsurance, the ceding company, seeking to mitigate its risk exposure, presents a specific risk to a reinsurer. This submission includes detailed information about the risk, allowing the reinsurer to conduct a thorough underwriting assessment. The reinsurer then decides whether to accept the risk and, if so, at what terms and pricing. The agreement on a facultative reinsurance contract is bespoke, tailored to the nuances of the presented risk. Traditional facultative reinsurance is issued on a certificate of facultative reinsurance (typically called a "fac cert"), which can be a single page with the risk details on the front of the certificate and standard terms and conditions on the back of the certificate. More recently facultative certificates have become multi-page documents with terms and conditions resembling a treaty.

During the negotiation process in facultative reinsurance, the ceding company must accurately represent the risk, including all relevant data and projections, to the reinsurer. The reinsurer, in turn, evaluates the risk based on its underwriting expertise, capacity, and risk appetite. This back-and-forth can involve adjustments to coverage terms, pricing, and exclusions until both parties reach a mutual agreement.

Key Features of Facultative Reinsurance

Unlike blanket agreements that cover multiple policies regardless of individual risk characteristics, facultative reinsurance allows for a deep dive into the specifics of a single risk. This leads to more precise pricing and terms that reflect the actual risk involved.

Negotiation is not just a preliminary step but a continuous component of the facultative reinsurance process. Each risk presented for reinsurance triggers a new round of negotiations, where terms, coverage limits, and premiums are debated. This bespoke negotiation process enables a clear understanding and agreement on the coverage specifics, and mitigates future disputes.

Another distinctive feature of facultative reinsurance is the reinsurer's autonomy in decision-making. Reinsurers are not obligated to accept all risks presented to them. This selectivity allows reinsurers to manage their own risk exposure more effectively. They can choose to engage with risks that align with their risk appetite and expertise, and build a portfolio that reflects their strategic objectives and capacity.

Facultative reinsurers may participate on a ceding company's risk on a contributing excess basis, a concurrent basis, or a nonconcurrent basis.

Challenges and Considerations

The negotiation process, while a key feature of facultative reinsurance, also introduces complexity. Each risk requires its own set of negotiations, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. The need for detailed information about the risk, along with the back-and-forth between ceding companies and reinsurers, demands expertise and patience from both parties. This complexity can sometimes slow down the reinsurance process, particularly for highly unique or complex risks.

The success of facultative reinsurance transactions heavily relies on the underwriting expertise of both the ceding company and the reinsurer. Understanding the nuances of each risk, as well as the broader market and industry trends, is crucial. The underwriters' skill in evaluating risks, setting terms, and pricing the reinsurance coverage appropriately is a cornerstone of effective facultative reinsurance.

Although traditionally facultative reinsurance reinsures an individual risk, there are other facultative reinsurance arrangements such as automatic fac, semi-automatic fac and obligatory fac. These hybrid arrangements differ from traditional facultative reinsurance because of the nondiscretionary nature of the risk cession.

IRMI's Risk Financing offers an extensive guide on risk finance options, covering traditional insurance plans, reinsurance, and alternative markets like captive insurance. Unlock access now.

Comparing Facultative and Treaty Reinsurance

Facultative reinsurance and treaty reinsurance are two primary methods insurers use to transfer risk. While facultative reinsurance deals with individual risks on a case-by-case basis, treaty reinsurance involves a pre-arranged agreement that automatically covers a class or portfolio of risks.

The choice between facultative and treaty reinsurance depends on several factors, including the nature of the risks, the insurer's risk management strategy, and the desired flexibility in coverage. Facultative reinsurance is often favored for large or unusual risks that do not fit well into the standardized categories of treaty reinsurance. It allows for tailored coverage and precise risk management. On the other hand, treaty reinsurance is more efficient for handling a large volume of risks with similar characteristics, offering ease of administration and automatic coverage.

Facultative reinsurance may be placed on a specific risk that is also subject to treaty reinsurance. In these circumstances, the facultative reinsurance typically inures to the benefit of the treaty, and responds to a loss before the treaty. This priority is reflected in a treaty provision stating that the treaty covers the ceding insurer's net retained line.

FAQs

Q: What is facultative reinsurance?

A: Facultative reinsurance is a type of reinsurance where each risk or exposure that a ceding company wishes to reinsure is individually offered to and negotiated with a reinsurer. This process allows for a detailed assessment and customized coverage for specific risks.

Q: How does facultative reinsurance differ from treaty reinsurance?

A: Facultative reinsurance focuses on individual risks, with each risk being separately negotiated and covered. Treaty reinsurance, in contrast, provides automatic coverage for a defined portfolio of risks under set terms and conditions, without the need for individual negotiation for each risk.

Q: What are the advantages of facultative reinsurance?

A: Facultative reinsurance offers tailored coverage for specific risks, provides insurers with greater flexibility and control over their reinsurance decisions, and enhances risk management by allowing for detailed assessment and negotiation of each risk.

Q: Can a reinsurer decline a facultative reinsurance submission?

A: Yes, a reinsurer has the discretion to accept or decline any facultative reinsurance submission. This selectivity allows reinsurers to manage their own risk exposure effectively by choosing risks that align with their capacity, appetite, and underwriting expertise.

Related Terms