There has been much hand wringing and wailing over the malfeasance of the
corporate officers and directors of Enron, WorldCom, and others. No one, however,
has gone to the root causes of the situation. It is not that some corporate
executives suddenly turned to the dark side and became evil. It is, I submit,
because they were trained by the Department of Justice and local prosecutors
to believe that there was no penalty for their crimes. White-collar crime, especially
insurance fraud, has been ignored for the last two decades as a serious crime.
A crime unpunished emboldens others who might never consider a life of crime
to pursue wealth the easy way.
The prosecutorial obsession with violent crime has instigated massive growth
in so-called white-collar crime. Fraud is rampant and unpunished. Every year
more than $100 billion is stolen from Medicare and Medicaid programs across
the country while private property and casualty insurers lose a similar $100
billion every year to insurance criminals.
Prosecution of the massive crime perpetrated against insurers and government
"insurance" programs like Medicare are miniscule, to the point of nonexistence.
It is so easy, with so little chance of being caught, to commit insurance fraud
that schools are being formed to teach gang members to commit insurance fraud
so that they can move out of the dangerous field of armed robbery, where, if
not killed by the convenience store operator, the robber will surely be hunted
down and prosecuted. A prosecutor told me that the robbery of a convenience
store, with a gun, where no one is hurt and $300 is stolen, is more important
than a $2 million fraud against an insurer perpetrated by the stroke of a pen
in the hands of an insurance criminal.
The Victims "Insurers" Pay for Justice
The police and prosecutors ignore the person who commits a white-collar crime.
Insurers, as victims of crime, are disfavored. Some police officers, prosecutors,
and judges believe that an insurance company cannot be a victim of a crime.
Unlike all other crime victims, insurers are required by statute to fund local
police agencies and prosecutors, conduct the entire investigation, and present
the case to the prosecutor on pain of losing the right to do business. The prosecutor
will then review the materials and refuse to prosecute for lack of evidence.
Police agencies "except for insurer-paid-for Insurance Fraud Bureaus" ignore
insurance fraud and many other white-collar crimes.
The California Department of Insurance added an extra 25 cents per auto policy
tax to pay for the fight against automobile insurance fraud. Insurers are compelled
by statute and Regulation to maintain Special Fraud Investigation Units and
a detailed antifraud program.
The California Department of Insurance audits insurers regularly to be sure
that each insurer works hard to investigate and seek prosecution of the crime
of insurance fraud. Simultaneously, the same Department of Insurance punishes
insurers for not paying claims rapidly or for not treating insureds or claimants
fairly, many of whom are experienced insurance cheats who use the Department's
consumer unit to brow-beat insurers into paying fraudulent claims. Courts and
juries will assess punitive and exemplary damages against insurers who accuse
their insureds of fraud looking with 20/20 hindsight at the investigation.
Similar businesses in the financial sector that are also regular victims
of fraud and other crimes are not taxed or compelled to investigate crimes committed
against them. No one demands that the banking industry pay for prosecuting embezzlers
or bank robbers. No one demands that convenience store operators pay for prosecuting
people who hold up their stores on a daily basis. No regulator requires stockbrokers
to investigate fraudulent transactions. The imposition on the insurance industry "and
the attendant cost passed to the insurance consumer" is unique.
Insurers are treated differently than all other businesses in the United
States in this regard. George Orwell was right when, to paraphrase, he had a
character in Animal Farm say, "All businesses
are equal, some are more equal than others." Clearly, insurers are less equal
with regard to crimes perpetrated against them than are other businesses.
Special Bureaus Fight Fraud
The Coalition Against Insurance Fraud reported that fraud convictions have
doubled during the years 1995 to 2000. State Insurance Fraud Units (police agencies
assigned to the crime of insurance fraud that exist in 41 of the 50 states)
reported the following.
- Criminal convictions from fraud-bureau investigations doubled.
- Cases presented for prosecution by fraud bureaus more than doubled.
- Civil actions more than tripled.
- Two of three states increased their fraud bureau budgets.
- States are spending an average of 43 cents per resident to fight
fraud while fraud takes an average of $300 a year from each person
insured.
- Fraud bureau investigations in the United States led to 2,123
criminal convictions in 2000. This is double the 961 reported in
1995.
- Fraud bureaus presented 4,000 cases for prosecution in 2000.
This is up from 1,562 in 1995. Florida leads the nation with 688
referrals in 2000. South Carolina's referrals rose 355 percent
between 1999 and 2000.
- Twelve new fraud bureaus were created between 1995 and 2000.
- There are now 41 states that sponsor a total of 46 fraud bureaus.
- Fraud bureaus with prosecutors assigned to them have more success
with criminal convictions and more cases considered for prosecution.
|
What Do the Results Really Show?
Insurance fraud prosecutions and investigations are anemic. They have averaged
46 convictions per fraud bureau in the year 2000. They have averaged only 86
referrals for prosecution per fraud bureau. Florida led the states with 688
referrals in 2000. There was an investment in the year 2000 of $47,103 for every
conviction.
What the reports do not tell is that most of those convicted pleaded guilty
and were sentenced to probation. Few made full restitution. Those who served
time were few and far between.
Read the reports: The criminals are laughing at the insurance industry, the
police agencies, and the prosecutors. If they are one of the 2,123 criminally
convicted, they face an average sentence of only 5 years' probation and 60
days in jail. Jail time is usually served on weekends.
Fraud bureaus are not as effective as they want to be or want insurers to
believe. Only 47 percent of the cases referred for prosecution resulted in a
conviction. Those convicted were a minimal percentage of the cases referred
by insurers to the fraud bureaus.
In California, and many other states, the law requires insurers to report
suspected fraudulent claims to the fraud bureau. California insurers report
approximately 2,000-3,000 suspected fraudulent claims each month. Few are
investigated, fewer are reported to prosecutors for prosecution, and only 47
percent reported to prosecutors for prosecution result in a conviction.
Contrary to the belief of many prosecutors, even though people are seldom
physically injured by insurance fraud, it is a major crime with a statutory
maximum punishment in most of those states where it is a crime of 5 years in
state prison.
Specialists who understand insurance and insurance fraud investigate it.
It is, at least in California and those states that have a criminal insurance
fraud statute, a rather simple crime to prove. It should be the type of case
a prosecutor would want to file and take to trial. Instead, as an ex-prosecutor
said, "Insurance fraud is a crime prosecutors run away from because the cases
are usually heavy with documentary evidence and are complex."
Consider the public outcry if gangs of bank robbers took $100 billion every
year from banks in the United States. Would the public stand for groups of criminal
stockbrokers looting their 401k and other pension plans? What would happen if
a motorcycle gang went across the country and stole $100 billion every year
from convenience stores across the country? When the public is told that a group
of criminals steals $100 billion every year from the insurance industry, the
response is either a cheer or a yawn.
I have heard the following from prosecutors to whom insurance fraud cases
were presented.
- A confession on the record with five corroborating witnesses is not
enough evidence to support a fraud prosecution.
- An insurance company can't be a victim of a crime.
- You have a good case but I don't have time to prepare an indictment
or take the case to a grand jury.
- Juries don't like insurance companies.
- Are you bringing this case because you don't want to pay a legitimate
claim?
- I don't understand what the claimant did wrong.
A Proposal
If the country wants to stop insurance fraud, it must recognize that a major
crime exists. Police, prosecutors, and judges must recognize that a gang that
is bleeding the country, its taxpayers, and insurance premium payers blind is
harming the entire country. Certain steps need to be taken, as shown below.
Enough letters, enough complaints, and insurance fraud will finally be recognized
by prosecutors to be a serious crime. To defeat insurance fraud it must be prosecuted.
To get it prosecuted, the insurer must do the work. Insurance fraud and all
white-collar crimes is the orphan child of the criminal justice system. Fraud
will never be defeated until the public and prosecutors recognize that insurance
fraud is a serious problem that affects their own financial condition.
Everyone involved in the business of insurance and everyone who buys insurance
must make it clear that they are angry with what is happening to their insurance
premium dollar. When I, and everyone who has ever purchased a policy of insurance,
hears that $300 out of every $1,000 we pay in premium goes to a criminal, we
should all want to scream out the window, as did the character in Network, "I'm mad as hell, and I'm
not going to take it any more!"