This article examines the new ISO war, military action, and terrorism exclusions applicable to the business auto, business auto physical damage, motor carrier, truckers, and garage coverage forms and which states have approved them.
Insurance Services Offices, Inc. (ISO), filed two optional commercial auto exclusionary endorsements in January of this year. The endorsements were filed in all jurisdictions except Guam, Hawaii, and Massachusetts. As of May 17, 2002, the filings have been approved in 26 jurisdictions and disapproved in 1 (Virginia). See Figure A for a listing of states that have approved these filings.
Table 1. Figure A: State Approvals of Commercial Auto War, Military Action and Terrorism Endorsement Filings
Alabama
Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
Delaware
Dist. of Columbia
Idaho
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Nebraska
New Hampshire
New Mexico
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Utah
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
The war, military action and terrorism exclusion (CA 23 37) applies to the business auto, business auto physical damage, motor carrier, and truckers coverage forms. The endorsement replaces and expands the war exclusion under:
liability coverage
physical damage coverage
trailer interchange coverage
auto medical payments coverage
personal injury protection (PIP) coverage, if the PIP coverage contains a war exclusion
PIP coverage, if the PIP coverage does not already have a war exclusion
The war, military action and terrorism exclusion—garage coverage form (CA 23 38) applies to the garage coverage form. The endorsement replaces and expands the war exclusion under:
liability coverage
physical damage coverage
auto medical payments
garage locations and operations medical payments coverage, and
personal injury protection coverage (PIP), if the PIP coverage contains a war exclusion
personal injury liability coverage—garages endorsement or
personal and advertising injury liability coverage under the broadened coverage-garages endorsement
uninsured/underinsured motorists coverage, and
PIP coverage, if the PIP coverage does not already have a war exclusion
The endorsements are patterned after the commercial general liability (CGL) policy endorsements (please refer to The ISO Terrorism Exclusions: Background and Analysis on IRMI.com for a full discussion) that have already been approved in a majority of states. In general, this change expands application of the war exclusion beyond contractual liability to include acts of terrorism. The term terrorism is defined as:
"Terrorism" means activities against persons, organizations, or property of any nature:
That involve the following or preparation for the following:
Use or threat of force or violence; or
Commission or threat of a dangerous act; or
Commission or threat of an act that interferes with or disrupts an electronic, information, or mechanical system; and
When one or both of the following applies;
The effect is to intimidate or coerce a government or the civilian population or any segment thereof, or to disrupt any segment of the economy; or
It appears that the intent is to intimidate or coerce a government, or to further political, ideological, religious, social or economic objectives or to express (or express opposition to) a philosophy or ideology.
Quantitative thresholds—insured property damage of $25 million, or death or serious physical injury to 50 or more persons—are set forth to determine when the terrorism exclusion is triggered. Multiple incidents of terrorism that occur within a 72-hour period and appear to be carried out in concert or to have a related purpose or common leadership are considered to be one incident.
In conjunction with these endorsement filings, a new manual rule (111) was introduced that gives insurers two options: attach the applicable endorsement and apply ISO loss costs or insurer rates; or refer to insurer for rating. The implication, of course, is that when the endorsements are not attached, the insurer will apply some kind of debit rating for the exposure.
Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.
This article examines the new ISO war, military action, and terrorism exclusions applicable to the business auto, business auto physical damage, motor carrier, truckers, and garage coverage forms and which states have approved them.
Insurance Services Offices, Inc. (ISO), filed two optional commercial auto exclusionary endorsements in January of this year. The endorsements were filed in all jurisdictions except Guam, Hawaii, and Massachusetts. As of May 17, 2002, the filings have been approved in 26 jurisdictions and disapproved in 1 (Virginia). See Figure A for a listing of states that have approved these filings.
Alabama
Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
Delaware
Dist. of Columbia
Idaho
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Nebraska
New Hampshire
New Mexico
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Utah
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
The war, military action and terrorism exclusion (CA 23 37) applies to the business auto, business auto physical damage, motor carrier, and truckers coverage forms. The endorsement replaces and expands the war exclusion under:
The endorsement adds an exclusion for:
The war, military action and terrorism exclusion—garage coverage form (CA 23 38) applies to the garage coverage form. The endorsement replaces and expands the war exclusion under:
The endorsement adds an exclusion for:
The endorsements are patterned after the commercial general liability (CGL) policy endorsements (please refer to The ISO Terrorism Exclusions: Background and Analysis on IRMI.com for a full discussion) that have already been approved in a majority of states. In general, this change expands application of the war exclusion beyond contractual liability to include acts of terrorism. The term terrorism is defined as:
Quantitative thresholds—insured property damage of $25 million, or death or serious physical injury to 50 or more persons—are set forth to determine when the terrorism exclusion is triggered. Multiple incidents of terrorism that occur within a 72-hour period and appear to be carried out in concert or to have a related purpose or common leadership are considered to be one incident.
In conjunction with these endorsement filings, a new manual rule (111) was introduced that gives insurers two options: attach the applicable endorsement and apply ISO loss costs or insurer rates; or refer to insurer for rating. The implication, of course, is that when the endorsements are not attached, the insurer will apply some kind of debit rating for the exposure.
Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.