In this first article on big data and predictive analytics, the vision of possibilities for data-driven companies to focus their analytical resources is laid out. Each one has its own data source(s), data approach, operational considerations, and analytic methodology to be applied. In addition, all of these facets of potential solutions can vary by company, since every insurer does business differently.
My mother wanted me to be a doctor. Since my handwriting was too neat, I opted for a career in insurance, which, thankfully, has been a solid path for many years. My first job was as an underwriter trainee, and I worked my way through the chairs to an executive role in 15 years, later making the transition to sales. While it's been a rewarding career for me, I cannot help but think what life would have been like if I had opted for another fork in the road along the career path.
One doesn't have to look too far to notice the demand for data scientists, data managers, predictive modelers, actuaries, and the like. With merely one "zig" toward a different corner of the insurance world instead of the "zag" I chose, I might have crossed into a land of opportunities with enough runway to double the longevity of my career. That doesn't mean you shouldn't reap the benefits of my hindsight—you should!
Predictive analytics began its commercial run through insurance in 1993 when Fair, Isaac and Equifax introduced Property Loss Score, the first consumer credit-based score for insurance. Twenty-three years later, it seems like we're barely applying analytics throughout our enterprises. Really, we've hardly touched the surface as an industry.
Over the years, I've listened to insurers about their business objectives and have been an evangelist for transforming to a data-driven culture. The early and continuing focus of data-driven decisions has been the use of analytics to support pricing and underwriting strategies. Nearly all companies with even basic analytical capabilities are using analytics to support pricing. Generally, the exceptions have been largely skewed to the larger companies with cubicles filled with analysts using or researching all sorts of modeling techniques to derive predictive signal out of any data they have or can get their hands on.
Of course, there are outliers. I've met with large insurers that are still late in the "data driven" game compared to similarly-sized peers. I've also met small insurers who use the little data they have to support models for any business decision possible. All insurers have the same opportunities and challenges, but some, of course, have more data to work with and/or ample resources to approach the problem than others.
Below is a list of "How do I?" questions insurers are always asking and, thus, are ripe for the Moneyball approach. In some cases, it's possible to seek answers through data and analytics. And, for some business questions, a less quantitative strategy may be the only tool available. This list is not a pipe dream when looking at the industry as a whole. All of these questions are being explored by an analyst somewhere, and I am sure I have overlooked a few. This list proves there is job security for those with training, ability, and the right tools to solve them.
The paper "Thinking Big About Big Data In Insurance" (Chunka Mui, Jan 22, 2016), published on Forbes' website, is an interview in which Tom Warden, formerly chief data officer at AIG Life and Retirement, states
First, companies need to recognize that Job 1 is leveraging data to optimize the profit machines they already have. Best practice today is to embed more predictive modeling in all parts of the value chain. You don't necessarily need Big Data to do that. You need smart people, a disciplined approach and a culture of cooperation to monetize data-driven insights.
I'm a fan of Mr. Warden's approach of starting small. Tackling big data right away is a major challenge. Insurers have been more successful getting "little data" right first.
The biggest challenge for every analytic objective is implementation. Early successes are realized with less complicated implementations, probably for obvious reasons. It's hard to get buy-in around the company until results are evident. Quick wins are still wins! That means easy IT implementation (more on that in a future article) and a solid fit for the ultimate users of the analytic result (another article topic).
Given how long predictive analytics have been embedded in our industry, it still amazes me to see resistance from end users. My belief is the benefits to them are just not communicated well enough, and the end users are not part of the process from the beginning. Who else is better equipped to find the best use of the analytic result and to make sure the result matches business requirements?
Our business is here for the long haul, as are most of our careers. There is still so much to accomplish in our industry, and competition continues to accelerate with the availability of data and technology. Meanwhile, I will continue on my established career path and remain a casual observer of the road not taken.
- I shall be telling this with a sigh
- Somewhere ages and ages hence:
- Two roads diverged in a wood, and I —
- I took the one less traveled by,
- And that has made all the difference.
- Robert Frost*
*originally published in Mountain Interval, Henry Holt and Company, 1916.
Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.