Expert Commentary

Why 2017 Promises To Be a Year of Unprecedented Political Risk

There is no denying that 2016 was a year filled with significant and tangible unanticipated events in the political, economic, and security realms. Whether considering Donald Trump's election, the first Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) output cut in 8 years, or the resurgence of lone wolf terrorist attacks, most of us were caught by surprise on a routine basis and wondered what could possibly be coming next.

Political Risk
December 2016

2017 Promises To Be a Year of Unprecedented Political Risk

2017 will see dramatic acceleration of unforeseen change, which will present unprecedented risk to businesses—both domestic and international—as well as ushering in what should prove to be unprecedented changes in the regulatory and risk management landscape in the United States, which should once again prove that it retains the unique ability to impact trade and investment climates throughout the world.

The Trump Administration will clearly not be able to implement every legislative initiative it may wish to pursue, even with Republican majorities in the House and Senate. Apart from the fact that legislators don’t tend to spend all that much time actually "legislating" in Congress, Trump’s ambitions are too grandiose for a lackluster Congress, unaccustomed to being highly productive, and which will continue to be ruled by pork-barrel politics and institutionalized corruption—despite Trump’s claims that he will be tackling this head on.

President-elect Trump will, in his first 100 days, be forced to prioritize his objectives and will no doubt place heightened investment in infrastructure, building the wall along the border with Mexico, and ramping up the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) at the top of his wish list.

Financial Sector Changes

Given that so many of Trump’s cabinet and other appointments have proven to be Wall Street veterans, I do not foresee much in the way of financial service reform occurring during his administration, but I do expect him to proceed apace with penalizing firms who move jobs out of the United States. So time-tested maquiladoras and outsource-oriented businesses may need to quickly rethink their own priorities.

As was swiftly illustrated in the Carrier base, having spent millions of dollars to nearly complete its new plant in Mexico did not stop Trump from aggressively pursuing the company. Even though it appears that Carrier was offered ample tax incentives to rethink its position, the near-term financial hit it will take will hurt. Trump clearly wanted to make a high-profile example of the company to send a strong message. We should expect much more of that.

Foreign investors will clearly need to think twice about simply plopping down tens or hundreds of millions of dollars and robotically investing in the United States during the Trump Administration, as so many have done for so long. There is a new sheriff in town, and he won’t be shy about grabbing his regulatory gun from its holster when it comes to ensuring that foreign investors pay their fair share of taxes, play by U.S. rules, and insist that American companies are treated fairly when investing overseas. There is also a very real risk that bilateral trade conflicts (I hesitate to use the word “wars”) will erupt in due course, as the propensity for tit-for-tat sanctions rises along with Trump’s rhetoric and executive actions. While full-fledged trade conflicts will remain a background risk with America’s largest trading partners, it seems highly unlikely that the United States and China (for instance) will start destroying what is a mutually beneficial trading relationship.

Political Changes

Politically, the greatest risk will clearly be the rise of the right globally, along with the implications of shifting geopolitical alliances. The right is on the march in Europe and Asia, and along with grave concern for the sanctity of America’s bilateral relationship with some of its staunchest post-war allies across the pond, countries such as the Philippines and Malaysia have already put the United States on notice that they stand ready to embrace China (and Russia) as the sands continue to move beyond the Middle East.

Even though many may not realize it, we are witnessing a paradigm shift not seen since the fall of the Soviet Union in terms of changing alliances and allegiances. China and Russia both stand to gain as a result of the changes under way. The United States will be contributing to that process in a major way.

Economic Changes

Economically, the United States and other parts of the world are well overdue for a recession, and it would not be all that surprising if it were to begin in 2017. Despite the booming stock market and rising commodity prices, underlying fundamental weaknesses in the global economy have yet to be meaningfully addressed. Trade imbalances, rising inequality, and currency weaknesses are among the variables bubbling beneath the surface. Given the right set of conditions (such as a new war or currency collapse in a major country), the global economy could appear to be a house of cards rather than a fortress with a seemingly sturdy foundation.

Terrorism Changes

From a security perspective, President-elect Trump’s desire to ramp up the fight against ISIS implies a heightened risk of retaliatory terrorist attacks in the United States and the West. While hardly a new phenomenon, the increasing frequency of successful lone-wolf attacks in the United States and Europe during 2016 should be seen as a trend rather than an anomaly.

Businesses are going to need to devote even more resources toward ensuring that they, and their employees, are protected. Cyber-risk will continue to command the attention of risk managers and decision makers globally, highlighting not only the growing nature of the risk, but our collective vulnerability with each successful attack.

Foreign Policy Changes

Of all the looming risks in 2017, one of the most significant will probably prove to be the slow death of multilateralism. Trump has promised to kill the Trans-Pacific Partnership and has threatened to revise the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and other multilateral trade agreements the United States is already either party to or in the process of becoming a member. Given that U.S. leadership in the global trade and investment regime is critical and that so many other countries depend on U.S. participation to justify their own participation in such agreements, there is a very real chance that multilateralism—particularly for trade, but also for investment—may begin to unravel.

This is an ominous and potentially very damaging prospect, which not only prevents the United States from being able to influence the global trade and investment architecture in the future, but implies a complicated and unpredictable environment in which global businesses will be forced to operate in the short- to medium-term.


Clearly, 2017 is not going to be a year in which people in the risk management business can rest on their laurels, adopt or maintain a reactive approach to managing risk, or pursue conventional solutions to what have already become cutting edge problems. Regardless of who is sitting in the White House—or the Great Hall of the People in Beijing—our multipolar world implies that we need to adopt multidimensional approaches to managing risk and making decisions.

Regulatory risk, climate change, cyber-risk, terrorism, and trade policy are examples of risks that lay well beyond the domain of a single decision maker in business or government. Now, more than ever, risk managers need to be sitting at the table with decision makers, heavily involved in the planning process. Failure to do so will surely have profound implications for businesses of all sizes in the coming year.

*Daniel Wagner is managing director of Risk Cooperative and coauthor of the new book Global Risk Agility and Decision Making.

Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

Like This Article?

IRMI Update

Dive into thought-provoking industry commentary every other week, including links to free articles from industry experts. Discover practical risk management tips, insight on important case law and be the first to receive important news regarding IRMI products and events.

Learn More