IRMI Update
Risk Management & Insurance
Commentary, Tips, and Tactics
April 8, 2009 | Issue 203 | ISSN: 1530-7948
In This Issue
Colleague,
One of the things I try to avoid with this newsletter is political debates
because the weekly and daily press already inundate us with them. But I have
had to bite my tongue so many times since last October that I have decided to
weigh in on a single aspect of the AIG meltdown by focusing attention on the
biggest victims of the entire mess: the employees who work for the AIG insurance
units that were totally uninvolved with the financial products which imperil
the company.
The property and casualty insurance companies have been well managed and
are in excellent financial condition. Unfortunately, the press and politicians
paint with a very broad brush when they talk disparagingly about AIG practices
and people. Additionally, some of this criticism seems to be keeping the insurance
companies from engaging in practices that their competitors are free to do,
such as rewarding their best independent agents and brokers for placing business
with them. It is ironic that the United States bought 80 percent of the company
and then, through speeches by elected officials, has contributed to the demise
of the brand and the morale of the talented AIG people who remain.
Whenever the subject of AIG comes up with my friends outside the insurance
biz, I explain to them that the 40,000 or so employees of the P&C insurance
companies had nothing to do with the debacle and have certainly not benefited
from it in any way. Indeed, as both taxpayers and probably holders of at least
some AIG stock through the various company benefit plans, they likely have suffered
financially as much or more than most Americans. And the stress of the whole
thing must be absolutely overwhelming at times. Since the perceived integrity
of the entire industry is affected by the situation, I hope you are also making
these points to others, even if you compete with AIG.
If you are one of the many people at AIG who subscribe to this newsletter,
please know that I for one still greatly respect you and the AIG franchise.
Be proud that you helped build one of the most important insurance organizations
in the world and that, without the protection that it continues to provide,
commerce would suffer immensely, the economy would be in even worse shape, and
many more people would be losing jobs. Hold your head high with the knowledge
that at least some Americans understand that you are far from the cause of the
problem, and indeed the fruits of your labors will be a major contributor to
the final solution.
If you are not an AIG employee, would you like an opportunity to offer some
words of encouragement to the hardworking people of the insurance units? Well,
here it is. [See
reader
responses].
On another note, several of us at IRMI will be attending the annual RIMS
Conference in Orlando in a few weeks. If you plan to attend, please stop by
exhibit booth #2001 and say "Hello." Many thanks for choosing to be a member
of the 35,000 strong IRMI Update subscriber
family.
All the best,
Jack
Jack P. Gibson, CPCU, CRIS, ARM
President
International Risk Management Institute, Inc.
Risk Tip
Best Use of Construction Inspections
Quality assurance and control (QAC) has become an increasingly important
issue for contractors and project owners alike for both residential and commercial
projects. Inspections are a key part of any QAC program, and there are two fundamentally
different inspection protocols utilized by independent third-party inspectors
during the construction process. The first protocol is generally referred to
as "completed assembly inspection." This type of inspection is performed at
specific, predetermined stages of construction on completed elements only. This
is the same type of protocol used by municipal (e.g., building code) inspectors.
As each building component is completed, an inspection is requested. If the
inspection results are satisfactory, the item or process is "signed off," and
construction proceeds to the next construction element. With this approach,
each "completed assembly" is inspected.
The second inspection protocol is commonly known as "process inspection."
Process inspections are performed randomly, generally during unannounced site
visits, throughout the course of construction. Predetermined construction "milestones"
are reviewed by the inspector as they present themselves. This type of inspection
verifies that, in general, each process is being performed properly. It should
be noted that an inspector performing process inspections may be able to honestly
assert that "everything" has been inspected. However, while true that everything
was inspected at some stage of the process and at some location, every installation
will not have been inspected at each stage. Process inspections therefore do
not ensure that each completed assembly has been satisfactorily installed. For
example, there is no safeguard against defective workmanship by different field
crews.
Process inspection programs typically require fewer site visits and are (or
should be) less costly than completed assembly inspection programs. While process
inspections can be a cost-effective alternative to establish an overall audit
of construction processes, the risk of undiscovered construction defects may
be substantially higher than with completed assembly inspections. Therefore,
process inspections are effective for risk audits and completed assembly inspections
are most effective for quality control risk.
By: Sam A. McInnis
Pacific
InterWest Building Consultants, Inc.
Southern California Division Manager
GET PUBLISHED IN IRMI
UPDATE: Send us a practical tip (less than 300 words) for identifying
and managing risks, buying insurance, managing claims, or filling gaps in insurance
coverages. We'll acknowledge your contribution as we did for Sam.
Submit an IRMI Update risk
tip.
What's New in Your IRMI Library
Get Business Income Coverage Right
Business income (aka business interruption) insurance is certainly one of
the most complex and difficult to understand lines of coverage. Studies have
revealed that the majority of businesses that do not have the coverage never
resume operations following a catastrophic property loss. Thus, it is important
for risk professionals to make certain they "dot all the I's and cross all the
T's" when buying or selling this insurance.
We have recently updated the annotated business income coverage discussion
in
Commercial Property Insurance to help you do just that. The section now
addresses all the changes made in the 2007 revisions of the ISO forms and includes
significantly expanded coverage analysis on all parts of the form. These analyses
rely on and reference nearly 100 applicable court cases interpreting coverage.
Check them out:
The most significant 2007 changes to the ISO form were with the coverage
for actions of a civil authority. Even if you don't have time to review the
entire business income discussion, this discussion would be worth a quick read:
For summaries of other new and updated information in your IRMI library,
go to either:
Recent Articles on IRMI.com
New Expert Commentary
There are over 1,100 risk management and insurance articles on IRMI.com.
Below you'll find summaries of some recent additions with links to the articles.
IRMI
Professional Liability Insurance
Professional Liability Market Directory Update
We are in the process of updating our annual Professional Liability Market
Directory. The directory listing is provided as a service to our readers and
at absolutely no cost to you. If you are a direct source for professional liability
coverage (e.g., insurer, managing general agent) you and your firm can have
a free listing in the
Professional Liability Insurance Market Directory. Simply
complete the
appropriate information.
IRMI Featured Publication
Assure Your Contracts Provide the Proper Protection
Contractual Risk Transfer is a one-of-a-kind reference manual with the most
thorough explanation available of how to allocate risks in all types of contracts.
You'll save hours of drafting time with "boilerplate" insurance clauses. Use
the state-by-state analyses of anti-indemnity laws and how the courts interpret
hold harmless and indemnity clauses to bulletproof your clauses. Understand
when and how to require additional insured status. Plus, many more strategies
to protect your company.
See the table
of contents for this IRMI best-seller.
If you already subscribe, scan the topics covered by
Contractual Risk Transfer in the platform to which you subscribe: