IRMI Update—Issue #136
An E-mail Newsletter for Risk and
Insurance Professionals
ISSN: 1530-7948
May 3, 2006
In This Issue
Colleague,
Last month Sen. John Sununu (R-N.H.) and Sen. Tim Johnson (D-S.D.)
reignited the regulation debate when they introduced S. 2509, the
National Insurance Act of 2006.The Sununu-Johnson bill would establish
an optional federal charter for insurance companies (life, health,
and property-casualty), creating a dual system whereby insurers
could choose between being regulated by a new federal insurance
regulatory authority or continuing to be regulated by state insurance
departments.
Producers would also choose between state and federal regulation.
With a federal license, the producer could sell, solicit, and negotiate
insurance in any state on behalf of federally licensed insurers
and state licensed insurers with state regulation of their activities
preempted (with some exceptions). Alternatively, if the producer
chooses to remain licensed at the state level, it will remain subject
to the laws and regulations of the states.
The bill is strongly supported by those associations representing
insurers and producers with a national market focus and strongly
opposed by those whose members are predominately focused on a single
state or region. The banking associations also support it.
No one disputes that the current state insurance regulatory system
is simply too unwieldy, anticompetitive, and expensive. It has long
needed a major overhaul, and state insurance regulators have made
impressive strides toward a more uniform and efficient system. But
they will never achieve it as long as there are 50 state legislatures
and 50 state regulators around to exert their influence over their
state systems.
As much as I hate the thought of creating another federal agency,
an optional federal charter makes a lot of sense. We must face the
fact that our large insurers are competing not just here, but globally,
and they need a regulatory system that is fast and efficient. A
dual system seems to work fairly well for the banking industry.
Why not allow insurers and brokers the option of a federal charter?
What do you think? Is an optional federal charter a good idea?
Or will it result in even more costly and inefficient dual regulation
of the industry? [See
reader
responses.]
Thank you for subscribing to IRMI Update.
Have a great day.
Jack
Jack P. Gibson, CPCU, CRIS, ARM
President
IRMI
Improve Workplace Safety by Monitoring
Drug Abuse—While 75 percent of drug abusers are employed,
and 8-10 percent of employees in any organization are likely to
abuse drugs, only 4.5 percent are detected. The impact of drug abuse
on a corporation is, for the most part, simply not measured. Traditional
techniques for managing workplace drug abuse include education,
interdiction, assistance, and urine-based preemployment drug testing,
which have been only marginally effective at managing drug abuse.
While 90 percent of drug testing is done only on a preemployment
basis, this technique is little more than an "IQ" test. Since most
drugs are detectible for a maximum of 3-4 days, drug abusers simply
stop taking drugs for a few days, gain employment, and resume their
risky behaviors.
Some organizations are winning the war against drug abuse by
adopting alternative approaches, such as on-site oral-based drug
screening, which derive the following direct, measured benefits:
- 50+ percent reduction in on-the-job accidents
- Reduced workers compensation premiums
- Lower health benefit utilization rates
- Higher employee retention rates
- 30+ percent reductions in inventory shrinkage/employee
theft
In addition to oral testing, other interesting alternatives to
urine testing such as hair testing have emerged. Drug testing is
very easy to implement and legal—if not actually encouraged—in most
states. Package programs are available which can be tailored to
your firm. Drug testing commonly provides a 100x return on investment.
Not bad when you consider that you're likely paying out at least
$1 million every year for every 1,000 employees on your payroll
due to not have an effective drug free workplace program.
By: Peter Cholakis, Vice President, Marketing
Avitar Inc.
Canton, MA
Suggest a Risk
Tip. Send us a practical tip (less than 300 words) for
identifying and managing risks, buying insurance, managing claims,
or filling gaps in insurance coverages.
Submit your tips.
We'll acknowledge your contribution as we did for Peter.
We have recently updated a number of the reference manuals in
the IRMI library and published new issues of
The Risk Report and
Captive Insurance Company Reports.
To make sure you don't miss any of this new information take 30
seconds to scan the "What's New" summary page.
For IRMI Online and Print
Subscribers.
For
SilverPlume Sage subscribers.
There are now over 700 risk management and insurance articles
on IRMI.com. Below you'll find summaries of some recent additions
with links to the articles.
Are you considering forming a captive, or do you need help structuring
or operating a captive? Captive Practices and Procedures will help
you understand what it takes to make sure your captive is built
to last. This highly recommended book is the latest from Kate Westover,
who has set up and managed more than 50 successful captives during
her 20-plus years of experience. Learn more and
order here.
We are in the process of updating our annual Professional Liability
Market Directory. The directory listing is provided as a service
to our readers and at absolutely no cost to you. If you are a direct
source for professional liability coverage (e.g., insurer, managing
general agent), you and your firm can have a free listing in the
Professional Liability Insurance Market Directory. Simply provide
the appropriate information
here.
IRMI Update is sent to subscribers by plain text e-mail twice
each month. To initiate your free subscription, use the
e-mail registration form.