IRMI Update—Issue #48
An E-mail Newsletter for Risk and
Insurance Professionals
ISSN: 1530-7948
September 10, 2002
In This Issue
Colleague,
We at IRMI miss our friends who perished on September 11, and,
like you, we are dealing with the anniversary of the event in our
own ways. Perhaps one way to honor the victims is to assure that
we apply some of the important lessons learned to enable our organizations
to deal with the unexpected in the future. Some September 11 lessons:
- It is necessary to consider aggregation of different
types of risk because viewing it by coverage line
can lead to an underestimation of true exposure.
- Man-made catastrophes can rival or surpass those
caused by nature.
- Disaster recovery planning is absolutely critical.
- Property insurance limits should be carefully
evaluated.
- Though difficult to identify and measure, contingent
business interruption risks must be proactively
managed.
Perhaps the most important lesson is to take time to enjoy life
and appreciate family, friends, and colleagues.
All of us at IRMI wish you all the very best during this week
of remembrance and reflection. Thank you for subscribing to IRMI
Update. Have a great day.
Respectfully,
Jack
Jack P. Gibson
President
IRMI
Prepare Superior Underwriting Presentations.
It amazes me how few agents and brokers appear to take the time
to adequately prepare underwriting presentations for risk takers.
In that light, here are what I perceive as the three deadly sins.
(1) If you don't know more about the risk than the underwriter,
you lose. It is immaterial what the risk is, know "everything" possible
about it. If that means studying subject matter, so be it. For example,
if the presentation covers a chemical risk, understand the chemicals,
know if they are potentially explosive, reactive, nonreactive, etc.
Fully understand the physical risk, and have a clear handle on losses
and loss potential.
(2) For goodness sake, stop using ACORD forms. Present your clients
in a format that includes:
- An executive summary
- General and physical information of the potential
risk
- Safety or industrial certifications, e.g., ISO
9001, and their value
- Coverage Specifications
- Full underwriting information
- Complete loss data, and if casualty oriented,
you had better be prepared to defend trended and
developed losses.
- Premium expectations
(3) Never, never ask for a quote. Advise underwriters of premium
expectations and be able to defend them.
By: Peter Polstein
Retired Senior Vice President
Alexander & Alexander
New York City
E-mail:
Suggest a Risk
Tip. Send us a practical tip (less than 300 words) for
identifying and managing risks, buying insurance, managing claims,
or filling gaps in insurance coverages. We'll acknowledge your contribution
as we did for Peter.
There are now 331 articles on IRMI.com, and many more are in
production. Below you'll find summaries of some recent additions
with links to the articles.
What Does "Separation
Of Insureds" Mean (Part 2)—In this second article on
the meaning of separation of insureds in the CGL policy, court interpretations
of "the insured," "an insured," and "any insured" and their ramifications
are discussed.
Four 1-Day Sessions
Cover All The Bases—As part of the 22nd IRMI Construction
Risk Conference, to be held November 11-14 in San Diego, you have
four optional 1-day seminars to choose from:
- What's Hot in Construction Risk Management
- CGL Issues and Developments
- Loss Control in Construction
- Construction Insurance 101
Be sure to check out the agenda for the rest of the conference
and simply complete the online registration form to register. Hope
to see you in San Diego!
New Edition Of 101 Ways To Cut Insurance
CostsNow Available —The third edition of
101 Ways To Cut Business Insurance
Costs without Sacrificing Protection is a virtual how-to
guide of cost-cutting strategies for every major line of coverage.
Coauthor Jack Gibson says, "The substantial premium hikes everyone
is now seeing on their renewals has revived the need for active
management of insurance costs, and this book gives insurance buyers
the practical advice and information they need to once again take
charge of their insurance destiny." Available for only $34.95, it
will save you much, much more on your next renewal—even in this
hard market.
In the last issue of
IRMI Update,
readers were asked their opinion on when the hard market will end.
We received a wide variety of responses, some of which are reproduced
below.
- As a long time observer of the insurance industry
(38 years), it is my analysis and the philosophy
that underlies our firm's approach to the business,
that the conditions that we are currently facing
will continue through 2003 and possibly longer.
The reasons for this are as follows:
The medium term economic forecasts do not appear
to be bullish and therefore we prognosticate that
the investment results on which the industry has
depended to off-set underwriting losses is gloomy.
Institutional and individual market risk tolerance
has diminished in proportion to the losses sustained.
Rates will continue to rise for the next 18-24 months
and then probably hold steady for a like period
of time.
The interest rate reductions that the Fed has
made have not fueled a recovery, and future decreases
would be minimal since we are approaching almost
zero at the rediscount level. We are in a state
of economic limbo.
The question of industry reserve adequacy remains
unanswered but it is a major number. Whether it
is environmental, asbestos, construction defect,
workers compensation, or mold as the manifesting
cause for the shortfall in reserves, there are challenges
to the balance sheets of all long-lived insurance
companies that are not being addressed for obvious
reasons.
The excess capital that entered the market after
9-11 is not being employed. It has been sitting
on the sidelines. It would seem to be actually going
in another direction since the levels of return
are not considered acceptable. Existing markets
are hoisting various financial products to raise
capital since the run-up of earned premiums is taxing
surplus levels that have been depleted to some degree.
More revelations about corporate misconduct will
come to light that will impact the market despite
the cosmetic regulations about the CEO warranting
the correctness of their audited statements. Market
risk has depleted the savings of millions of people,
many being retirees, who now find that they have
to go back to work to survive.
The threat of terrorism in some form is still
a specter on the horizon and there is no reinsurance
mechanism at this time that has been created as
an industry backstop. Government resources are being
spent at record levels for the war on terrorism
which takes billions of dollars out of our domestic
economy. If we decide to expand that endeavor to
include Iraq, who knows that that will do to the
United States.
Natural disasters will continue to occur at an
unpredictable time and place. Another hurricane
Andrew can occur at any time.
Take all of these ingredients and mix them together.
If our industry could achieve a level of rational
thinking, there would be a high probability that
we could avoid the manic and the depressive approaches
to industry pricing, underwriting and results.
—John W. Kabaker, President,
Vista International Insurance Brokers, Novato, California
-
I think today's hard market will continue for
a long time for most carriers (especially those
who got caught up in the soft-stupid "no underwriting,
just get some premium" attitudes of the mid 1990s).
But I must confess, as a producer, I was partly
to blame. I would go back to underwriters for additional
credits when I was about to lose an account. But
today it's a different world—with terrorism a constant,
mold issues starting to snowball, etc. I fear that
we are in a hard market to stay. I would predict
that rates will rise about 15-25 percent annually
for the next 5 years, then level off for several
years. At that point, we may need to redefine "soft"
as a leveling of rates, or we may never see another
"soft" market in our lifetimes.
—Larry Jansen, CPCU, CIC,
PJC Insurance
-
Yes, it really is different this time, because
underwriters are—for the first time, actually—admitting
that they don't understand the companies they are
insuring (and, thus, also for the first time, are
not "giving away" the coverage). The problem is
that the best accounts (i.e., translated as "loss
free") are seeing 50-100 percent premium increases
which, in turn, is spurring a new wave of captive
formations and other alternative financing (translated
as "non-insurance solutions").
So where will this take us? The market will continue
to harden. The best companies (i.e., those that
are actually insurable) will continue to leave the
traditional insurance marketplace, which will further
prolong the hard market. Overcapacity in the insurance
market will be wrung out as the "low ballers" will
get all the poor risks while the AIGs and Chubbs
of the world will get the few quality risks that
remain—of course, most of their books of business
will convert from primary insurance (now in captives
and ARTs) to excess layer coverage. The hard market
for primary coverage will continue indefinitely
in this scenario, but the market for the excess
layers/reinsurance will get competitive again, perhaps
as soon as 2004, but I won't look for any relief
in 2003.
—Earl Varney, Risk Manager
-
In response to your request for guesses (and
let's not pretend they are anything but) on when
the hard market will end, let me begin by stating
that I am among the 30 percent of insurance people
in the workforce that remember the last hard market.
We believe that the market will begin to stabilize
with only modest price increases in 2003, the bulk
of which will occur in the long-tail lines. Unlike
the hard market of the 1980s, we do not see widespread
capacity problems. We do see carriers attempting
to migrate their business toward more slot-rated
products with less volatility, but this may be as
much a concession to automation as a reaction to
the market. Clearly, this present hard market is
primarily the result of overzealous and under-reasoned
investments on the part of carriers who chased rates
downward in an effort to raise investment capital
exacerbated by terrorist activities. With some analysts
predicting that the Dow has another 60 percent to
slide, it would be foolish to think insurance prices
will stabilize near term. Look for underwriters
to start returning telephone calls in 2004.
—Jon Barton
-
The market will begin softening in the spring
of 2003. Spring, after we have followed the poets'
advice and at least momentarily turned our thoughts
to love, will be the time when we all begin to understand
just how massive the market overreaction was and
how incredibly profitable 2002 will have been. Further
fructifying that appreciation will be massive reinsurance
overcapacity which will have been triggered, not
by advanced knowledge of 2002's profitability, but
by sheer greed. Underwriters will have realized
they sold everything off the 2002 shelves at inflated
panic prices and wish to continue the feeding frenzy.
Finally, and why didn't Adam Smith or Milton Friedman
think of this, the oversupply will start a pronounced
downward push in pricing which will be discernible
in third quarter 2003. Please send the gift certificate
for the best answer to...
—Jan Frederiksen
-
I expect this market to continue until the stock
market settles down. The volatility in our economy
is the root cause of the hard market—investment
income is down and is being made up in pricing.
I would predict that the current hard market will
remain for another 2 years. If America's companies
are not showing improved results at that time, the
market will remain firm, with only inflationary
overall pricing changes.
—Rich Edwards, CPCU, Commercial
Lines Underwriter,
Continental Western Group, Lincoln,
Nebraska
I feel that traditional comments like "previous
hard markets have tended to be about 36 months"
are a little out of tune with what the industry
is now facing. They are trying to recover from the
tragedy of September 11, 2001; the collapse of Enron
and Worldcom, and the ongoing and seemingly increasing
threat of terrorism related exposures. There is
nothing "traditional" about these phenomena. Mentioning
the usual cyclical nature of the insurance industry
in the same breath with this market just doesn't
make sense. Never before has any industry been called
upon to pay a loss of this dimension.
After years of pricing "abuse" the industry was
finally beginning to "harden" about 3 to 4 months
BEFORE the so called 9/11 event. This correction
was long overdue and definitely needed when one
thinks back to those days and we find that insurance
companies were not covering their underwriting losses
with investment gains.
With all the above as background, let me ask
a question! Did competition ever leave? Certainly
if it has, we haven't seen it in our operation.
The business is a competitive as ever; only now,
agents, brokers, and risk managers have to REALLY
understand the marketplace and how to navigate around
the now treacherous waters.
Actually, I am optimistic about the market. By
that I mean the market will remain hard for quite
a bit longer. This was and is a much needed correction
and finally, after all the recent happenings, the
industry is beginning to react accordingly. I would
be pessimistic if I thought the market was going
to go soft again so soon. Why, it's very simple!
To do so would put the entire industry in peril
and our creditability would be gone forever.
—Robert S. Seltzer, CPCU,
President, Cohen-Seltzer, Inc.
-
I'm positive that we'll see a hard market continue
at least till 2004 for many reasons, such as, for
instance:
o Higher and frequenting insured losses from
natural calamities
o Heavier losses from liability, deteriorating
environment, industrial and man-caused risks, BI
o Weakened traditional markets (with alternative
markets just born)
o WTC forthcoming settlement
o Worsened financial markets
o Premium hikes and extra income therefrom are
unlikely to have replenished the lost capacity by
the year of 2004 (will take 2 years at least)
—Yuri Kostin, Risk Manager,
JSC Sibneft, Moscow
-
As an "observer" of the market for over 30 years,
and working in a marketplace only a few miles distant
from NYC, this particular market cycle has some
very different conditions than any past eras. This
market was changing prior to 9/11 due to an unprecedented
period of aggressive pricing based on one of the
strongest growth periods in the U.S. economic history.
Many/most insurers were not making an underwriting
profit but their projections were based on a so-called
soft landing, and the usual settlement spiral of
significant claims. The move to shore-up reserves
and tighten underwriting had only begun when the
stock market began its fluctuations causing many
insurers to suffer major "paper" losses, but not
causing much panic as long as there was no need
to draw significant cash. The higher pricing would
improve cash flow and the need to sell stocks was
not pressing.
When 9/11 occurred, many underwriters were panicked
and did not have clear direction from senior management
who had never experienced this type of condition
(neither had anyone else). During the remainder
of 2001, many discussions and meetings were held
throughout the industry in an attempt to determine
what everyone else was doing. This period of inactivity,
improper activity, and in some cases, knee-jerk
reactions by a number of companies, caused a major
loss of confidence in both the economy and the insurance
industry.
With all of that, a new development swept through
the market during the first half of 2002: claims
were being processed faster than ever! Not just
at the primary carrier level, but at the reinsurance
and catastrophe level. The CAT, Agg, and Retro markets
nearly disappeared entirely with only faint traces
remaining. The demand for sizable payments has already
begun and sell offs of significant holdings began
occurring during the first quarter of 2002. This
does not bode well for the year-end figures for
many companies.
The real question for the ending of the market
cycle is when is the public confidence going to
return? The market has settled into a sort of trough
with each wave causing shifts in thinking at all
levels of the industry. Interest rates are at a
modern all time low, the stock market is well below
the most gloomiest of predictions, daily it seems
we are bombarded with corporate accounting scandals,
jobs are being lost in the tens of thousands, and
the possibility of war with Iraq is looming large.
Based on all of that, my feeling is the 2002
underwriting year will continue much as it is well
into 2003. Investment portfolios will be adjusted
by mid-year 2003 and the new capacity for excess
of loss, CAT, Agg., etc, will begin to look for
volume. Assuming the stock market has stabilized,
not necessarily gone up, but has become more predictable,
the market should begin to level off by the end
of 2003, and a soft return will begin after the
start of 2004.
—Tom Arney, President, The
PRM Cos., Albany, NY
-
The insurance industry has neither
the capacity to pay for nor the
ability to price acts of terrorism.
Hence, it will continue to be excluded
from all contracts. Underwriters
will become increasingly reluctant
to write what they perceive as a
"target" risk: Large industrial
complexes, sports facilities, power
generating facilities, etc. This
will cause a ripple effect through
our economy as lenders will become
reluctant to provide capital for
these projects. Ultimately, this
is an exposure the federal government
must assume.
-
There are far fewer insurance
and reinsurance companies now than
at any time in history with less
competition as a result. New capital
has been coming in, but this is
opportunistic capital looking for
a relatively quick and large return.
-
Over the next 5 years there will
continue to be increased movement
toward risk pooling, captive insurance
entities, RRGs, etc. Any moderate
to large size corporation and/or
aggregation of businesses with like
exposure will ultimately find themselves
in some sort of risk pooling mechanism.
Primary insurers will assume greater
risk and take larger retentions.
-
Brokers will increasingly become
consultants and advisors as opposed
to order takers.
-
In order to survive and prosper over the long
term, the insurance and reinsurance industry must
become far more proactive and entrepreneurial in
lieu of the present mode of retrenchment. They must
become true partners with their corporate and small
business clientele less that business simply disappear.
—Ben Silberstein, ACAS, MAAA, FCA, President,
AJA Risk Management Consultants, Inc., East Brunswick, New Jersey
A subscription to IRMI Update is absolutely free. Use the
e-mail registration form
to initiate or terminate your subscription.
|
|