Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Expand Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Expand D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Collapse Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Expand Risk Management -- Why and HowRisk Management -- Why and How
Collapse Free Risk Management and Multiline CommentaryFree Risk Management and Multiline Commentary
Expand Brand Equity and Product RecallBrand Equity and Product Recall
Expand Catastrophe Risk ManagementCatastrophe Risk Management
Expand Corporate AviationCorporate Aviation
Expand Corporate Fraud PreventionCorporate Fraud Prevention
Collapse Cyber and Privacy Risk and InsuranceCyber and Privacy Risk and Insurance
State Breach Notification Laws Continue To Change (June 2015)
Guidance for Incident Response Plans (May 2015)
Board Oversight of Cyberrisks: Directors and Officers Litigation (February 2015)
California Privacy Laws Change: Identity Theft Prevention and Mitigation Services (October 2014)
Changes in State Breach Notification Laws (August 2014)
Guidance for Managing Cybersecurity Risks (May 2014)
Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation (January 2014)
Revisiting Privacy Policies in Light of California Law (October 2013)
Privacy Rights for California Minors (September 2013)
Social Media Account Laws (August 2013)
FTC Updates Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule (May 2013)
FTC Issues Mobile Privacy and Security Guidance (February 2013)
Mobile Application Privacy Policy Enforcement (November 2012)
Digital Copier Privacy Regulation (September 2012)
Yawning in the Face of Privacy Risks (May 2012)
Consumer Privacy Framework and Next Steps (May 2012)
Hacking, Malware, and Social Engineering Threats (January 2012)
SEC Issues Guidance on Cybersecurity and Cyber Incident Disclosure (December 2011)
The Militarization of Cyber Space and the Risks for U.S. Businesses (November 2011)
SEC Requires Disclosure of Cyber Attacks (October 2011)
Massachusetts Enacts Privacy Regulations (September 2011)
Avoiding Privacy Risks: Smile! You're on the Web Camera! (March 2010)
The Developing Legal Standards for Data Security (August 2008)
Privacy and Security Litigation and Enforcement: Growing Risks for Businesses? (May 2007)
Deflecting and Responding to Data Security Breaches (February 2006)
"Media Liability" Coverage in Tech/Media/eBusiness Policies (February 2006)
Variations in "Fraud/Dishonesty" Exclusions in Tech/Media/eBusiness Policies (January 2006)
Insuring Liability for Third-Party Claims Seeking Lost Profits (November 2005)
Addressing Liability Risks for Data Loss from an Insurance and Contractual Risk Transfer Perspective (July 2005)
Addressing Privacy Risk from an Insurance and Contractual Risk Transfer Perspective (May 2005)
Storing Liability: The Increasing Risks of Off-Site Data Storage (May 2005)
Privacy: Outsourcing and the Need for a Vendor Compliance Strategy (March 2005)
E-mail Privacy: Does Your E-mail Take a Pit Stop? (September 2004)
Indemnity and Insurance Provisions in E-Business Contracts (July 2004)
Protecting Data Assets: Not Just a Cyberspace Issue (June 2004)
New Liability Forms and Media, Tech, and E-Business Risks (May 2004)
Protecting Your Employees from Identity Theft (February 2004)
Creating a Privacy Policy Compliant with the New Online Privacy Protection Act (December 2003)
Tech E&O—A Primer for Risk Managers (November 2003)
Going Public: Dealing with the Disclosure Mandate of California's Latest Privacy Law (September 2003)
Cyber Liability Insurance Market Update (August 2003)
Security Requirements in a Privacy World (June 2003)
The Growing Privacy Risk and the Insurance Industry (February 2003)
Insuring First-Party Cyber Risk for Fortune 1000 Companies (November 2002)
Stand-Alone E-Business Insurance: Who's Buying, Selling, and Why? (September 2002)
The End of Computer Virus Coverage as We Know It? (May 2002)
You Say Professional Services, I Say B2B Activities (January 2002)
Is Computer Data "Tangible Property" or Subject to "Physical Loss or Damage"?—Part 1 (August 2001)
Is Computer Data "Tangible Property" or Subject to "Physical Loss or Damage"?—Part 2 (November 2001)
E-Commerce Insurance Issues: A Year in Review (June 2001)
New Stand-Alone E-Commerce Insurance for First-Party Risks? (February 2001)
New Stand-Alone E-Commerce Insurance for Third-Party Liability Claims (Part 1) (December 2000)
New Stand-Alone E-Commerce Insurance for Third-Party Liability Claims (Part 2) (December 2000)
Third-Party Liability E-Commerce Risks and Traditional Insurance Programs (August 2000)
First-Party E-Commerce Risks (June 2000)
Insurance Issues for E-Commerce Activities (May 2000)
Expand Drafting and Interpreting Insurance PoliciesDrafting and Interpreting Insurance Policies
Expand Enterprise Risk ManagementEnterprise Risk Management
Expand Internal ControlsInternal Controls
Expand NanotechnologyNanotechnology
Expand Political RiskPolitical Risk
Expand Risk Management: A Systemic ApproachRisk Management: A Systemic Approach
Expand Risk Management TechnologyRisk Management Technology
Expand SecuritySecurity
Expand Terrorism Risk Management & InsuranceTerrorism Risk Management & Insurance
Expand IRMI InsightsIRMI Insights
Expand IRMI Update Newsletter ArchivesIRMI Update Newsletter Archives
Expand Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Expand Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Expand Claims, Caselaw, LegalClaims, Caselaw, Legal
Expand Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements

Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation

February 2014

Canada will begin regulating commercial electronic messages beginning July 1, 2014, under its new anti-spam legislation, commonly known as Canada's Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL). Under CASL, a commercial electronic message is a message sent by any means of telecommunication (e.g., an e-mail, a text message, an instant message, or a social networking communication), one purpose of which is to encourage participation in a commercial activity (i.e., any transaction, act, or conduct of a commercial character, regardless of expectation of profit). CASL applies to individuals and organizations in and outside of Canada and contains significant enforcement provisions for noncompliance.

by Melissa J. Krasnow
Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Bradley Freedman, who is Vancouver regional leader of the Borden Ladner Gervais LLP Technology Law Group in Canada, answered my questions about the general application, requirements, and enforcement of CASL as summarized below.

To Whom Does CASL Apply?

CASL applies to any individual or organization that sends, or causes or permits to be sent, a commercial electronic message if a computer system located in Canada is used to send or access the message, unless the message is subject to an exception specified in CASL.1

One important exception is when the individual or organization that sends the commercial electronic message, or causes or permits the message to be sent, reasonably believes the message will be accessed in a specified country (including the United States) and the message conforms to the anti-spam law of that country. See the schedule of these countries. Other exceptions include messages:

  • sent between individuals in a personal or family relationship (as defined in CASL's regulations);
  • sent to a person engaged in a commercial activity and consisting solely of an inquiry or application related to that activity;
  • sent within an organization concerning the activities of the organization;
  • sent between organizations that have a relationship and the message concerns the activities of the recipient organization;
  • sent in response to a request, inquiry, or complaint;
  • regarding certain kinds of legal and judicial communications;
  • sent to a limited-access secure and confidential account to which messages can only be sent by the person who provides the account to the person who receives the message;
  • sent and received on an electronic messaging service if certain prescribed requirements are satisfied;
  • sent by or on behalf of a registered charity to raise funds for the charity; and
  • sent by or on behalf of a political party or organization or a candidate for publicly elected office to solicit a contribution as defined in the Canada Elections Act. Each of those exceptions is narrowly defined in CASL.

What Does CASL Require?

CASL establishes an opt-in regime. An individual or organization generally must obtain the prior consent of a recipient before sending a commercial electronic message to the recipient, comply with prescribed formalities regarding the content of the commercial electronic message, and provide an effective unsubscribe mechanism.

Consent to receive a commercial electronic message may be express or, in limited circumstances, implied. A request for express consent must clearly and simply specify the purpose for which consent is requested, the specified information regarding the person or organization requesting the consent, and that the recipient may withdraw his or her consent. The information required to be disclosed in a consent request includes the name of the individual or organization requesting the consent and his or her postal address as well as telephone number, e-mail address, or website. The unsubscribe mechanism must be clear and prominent, at no cost to the recipient, and readily available via specified electronic means. The unsubscribe mechanism must be valid for at least 60 days after the commercial electronic message has been sent, and an unsubscribe request must be given effect within 10 business days.2

The consent requirement does not apply to certain kinds of commercial electronic messages, including messages that:

  • respond to a request for a quote or estimate for a commercial transaction;
  • facilitate, complete, or confirm a previous commercial transaction;
  • provide warranty, product recall, safety, or security information about a product or service used or purchased by the recipient;
  • notify of factual information about the ongoing use by a recipient of a product or service offered under a subscription, membership, account, loan, or similar relationship;
  • provide employment or benefits information; and
  • deliver products or services under a previous transaction.

Each of those exceptions is narrowly defined in CASL. Further, it is important to note that the information disclosure and unsubscribe mechanism requirements still apply even if the consent requirement does not apply.

What Are the Enforcement Provisions for Noncompliance with CASL?

Violations of CASL can result in liability to the sender of a prohibited commercial electronic message, persons who cause or permit the commercial electronic message to be sent, and persons who aid, induce, or procure the sending of the commercial electronic message. Also, directors, officers, and employers are subject to vicarious liability for noncompliance with CASL, subject to a due diligence defense.3

Beginning July 1, 2014, violations of CASL can result in administrative monetary penalties of up to C$1 million per violation for individuals and up to C$10 million for organizations. Beginning July 1, 2017, violations of CASL can be the subject of a private right of action by any affected individual or organization and can result in awards of compensatory damages and a private fine of up to C$200 per message or C$1 million per day. Class action lawsuits are anticipated.

Where Can I Learn More about CASL?

The Canadian government provides information about CASL, including the law, regulations, and FAQs.

1By comparison, in the United States, the federal Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing (CAN-SPAM) Act of 2003 applies to senders and initiators of commercial e-mail messages and, to a more limited extent, to transactional or relationship e-mail messages.

2The CAN-SPAM Act provides for certain identification and unsubscribe mechanism requirements for commercial e-mail messages. The opt-out must remain operative for at least 30 days after transmission of the original message. A recipient's opt-out request must be honored within 10 business days of receipt, except if the recipient provides affirmative consent subsequent to the opt-out request. There cannot be any requirement that the recipient pay a fee, provide any information beyond his or her e-mail address and opt-out preference, or take any step other than sending a reply e-mail or visiting a single Internet page as a condition for honoring an opt-out request. The e-mail address of a recipient that opts out cannot be sold, leased, exchanged, or otherwise transferred or released (including through any transaction or other transfer involving mailing lists bearing the recipient's e-mail address).

3Violations of the CAN-SPAM Act generally are enforced by the Federal Trade Commission. There also is state attorney general or other state official or agency enforcement of certain provisions of the CAN-SPAM Act.

Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

© 2000-2015 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.