Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Expand Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Expand D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Collapse Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Expand Risk Management -- Why and HowRisk Management -- Why and How
Collapse Free Risk Management and Multiline CommentaryFree Risk Management and Multiline Commentary
Expand Brand Equity and Product RecallBrand Equity and Product Recall
Expand Catastrophe Risk ManagementCatastrophe Risk Management
Expand Corporate AviationCorporate Aviation
Expand Corporate Fraud PreventionCorporate Fraud Prevention
Collapse Cyber and Privacy Risk and InsuranceCyber and Privacy Risk and Insurance
Consumer Privacy Framework and Next Steps (May 2012)
Hacking, Malware, and Social Engineering Threats (January 2012)
SEC Issues Guidance on Cybersecurity and Cyber Incident Disclosure (December 2011)
The Militarization of Cyber Space and the Risks for U.S. Businesses (November 2011)
SEC Requires Disclosure of Cyber Attacks (October 2011)
Massachusetts Enacts Privacy Regulations (September 2011)
Avoiding Privacy Risks: Smile! You're on the Web Camera! (March 2010)
The Developing Legal Standards for Data Security (August 2008)
Privacy and Security Litigation and Enforcement: Growing Risks for Businesses? (May 2007)
Deflecting and Responding to Data Security Breaches (February 2006)
"Media Liability" Coverage in Tech/Media/eBusiness Policies (February 2006)
Variations in "Fraud/Dishonesty" Exclusions in Tech/Media/eBusiness Policies (January 2006)
Insuring Liability for Third-Party Claims Seeking Lost Profits (November 2005)
Addressing Liability Risks for Data Loss from an Insurance and Contractual Risk Transfer Perspective (July 2005)
Addressing Privacy Risk from an Insurance and Contractual Risk Transfer Perspective (May 2005)
Storing Liability: The Increasing Risks of Off-Site Data Storage (May 2005)
Privacy: Outsourcing and the Need for a Vendor Compliance Strategy (March 2005)
E-mail Privacy: Does Your E-mail Take a Pit Stop? (September 2004)
Indemnity and Insurance Provisions in E-Business Contracts (July 2004)
Protecting Data Assets: Not Just a Cyberspace Issue (June 2004)
New Liability Forms and Media, Tech, and E-Business Risks (May 2004)
Protecting Your Employees from Identity Theft (February 2004)
Creating a Privacy Policy Compliant with the New Online Privacy Protection Act (December 2003)
Tech E&O—A Primer for Risk Managers (November 2003)
Going Public: Dealing with the Disclosure Mandate of California's Latest Privacy Law (September 2003)
Cyber Liability Insurance Market Update (August 2003)
Security Requirements in a Privacy World (June 2003)
The Growing Privacy Risk and the Insurance Industry (February 2003)
Insuring First-Party Cyber Risk for Fortune 1000 Companies (November 2002)
Stand-Alone E-Business Insurance: Who's Buying, Selling, and Why? (September 2002)
The End of Computer Virus Coverage as We Know It? (May 2002)
You Say Professional Services, I Say B2B Activities (January 2002)
Is Computer Data "Tangible Property" or Subject to "Physical Loss or Damage"?—Part 1 (August 2001)
Is Computer Data "Tangible Property" or Subject to "Physical Loss or Damage"?—Part 2 (November 2001)
E-Commerce Insurance Issues: A Year in Review (June 2001)
New Stand-Alone E-Commerce Insurance for First-Party Risks? (February 2001)
New Stand-Alone E-Commerce Insurance for Third-Party Liability Claims (Part 1) (December 2000)
New Stand-Alone E-Commerce Insurance for Third-Party Liability Claims (Part 2) (December 2000)
Third-Party Liability E-Commerce Risks and Traditional Insurance Programs (August 2000)
First-Party E-Commerce Risks (June 2000)
Insurance Issues for E-Commerce Activities (May 2000)
Expand Drafting and Interpreting Insurance PoliciesDrafting and Interpreting Insurance Policies
Expand Enterprise Risk ManagementEnterprise Risk Management
Expand Internal ControlsInternal Controls
Expand NanotechnologyNanotechnology
Expand Political RiskPolitical Risk
Expand Risk Management TechnologyRisk Management Technology
Expand SecuritySecurity
Expand Terrorism Risk Management & InsuranceTerrorism Risk Management & Insurance
Expand IRMI InsightsIRMI Insights
Expand IRMI Update Newsletter ArchivesIRMI Update Newsletter Archives
Expand Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Expand Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Expand Claims, Caselaw, LegalClaims, Caselaw, Legal
Expand Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements
Support

Hacking, Malware, and Social Engineering—Definitions of and Statistics about Cyber Threats Contributing to Breaches

January 2012

As breaches continue to occur and affected organizations determine whether and how to disclose these breaches, breaches and disclosure continue to be the subject of reports as well as media, legislative, and regulatory attention. See, for example, Melissa J. Krasnow, Securities and Exchange Commission Issues Guidance on Cybersecurity and Cyber Incident Disclosure (Dec. 2011).

by Melissa J. Krasnow
Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The 2011 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report examined breaches that Verizon, the U.S. Secret Service, and the Dutch National High Tech Crime Unit investigated in 2010. This report classified and tallied the types of cyber threats that contributed to breaches. Hacking and malware were utilized in the majority of the breaches, at 50 percent and 49 percent, respectively. Social engineering was involved in 11 percent of the breaches.1 Many times, these three types of cyber threats from the report and related terms are used but not defined.

This article provides definitions of and statistics from the report about hacking, malware, and social engineering as well as the related terms pretexting, phishing, and spear phishing.

Hacking

Hacking is a broad term that describes all attempts to intentionally access or harm information assets without or in excess of authorization by thwarting logical security mechanisms. The three methods of hacking utilized most commonly in hacking breaches were exploitation of back doors or command/control functionality, exploitation of default or guessable credentials, and brute force and dictionary attacks, at 73 percent, 67 percent, and 52 percent, respectively. With a back door installed, an attacker can bypass security mechanisms and obtain access without using legitimate channels. Regarding the other two methods, an attacker tries a few well-known combinations of default credentials used on various types of systems and, if necessary, then runs a brute force attack to crack the system.

Malware

Malware is short for malicious software and means any software or code developed or used for compromising or harming information assets without the owner's informed consent. Malware enables or prolongs access, captures data, and/or furthers the attack. The most common means of infection for malware is installation or injection by a remote attacker, constituting 81 percent of malware infections. One example is an attacker breaching a system and then deploying malware or injecting code via SQL injection or other Web application input functionality. Web-based malware, the second most common means of infection, comprises code that is auto-executed (also known as drive-by downloads) and code that requires additional user interaction beyond the page visit (e.g., fake audiovisuals scaring users to "click here to scan and clean your infected system").

Sending data to an external site/entity, back door, and keylogger/form-grabber/spyware were the three most common functions found in malware breaches, at 79 percent, 78 percent, and 66 percent, respectively. A back door allows an attacker unauthorized access to infected devices, and an attacker can install additional malware, use the device as a launch point for further attacks, or retrieve captured data. A keylogger allows an attacker to build a preconfigured remote installation package that will be deployed on a target system that can capture data from user activity.

When malware captures sensitive information, it must be taken out of the organization's environment: Either the malware sends it out of the organization (in almost 8 out of 10 incidents involving malware) or the attacker reenters the network to retrieve it. The general rule is that smaller packets are sent out (i.e., credentials captured by keyloggers) while larger amounts of data are retrieved (i.e., the contents of a network file share transmitted through a back door's file transfer capabilities).2

Social Engineering

In a social engineering attack, an attacker uses human interaction (i.e., social skills) to obtain or compromise information about an organization or its computer systems. Social engineering tactics include deception, manipulation, and intimidation to exploit the human element or users of information assets. An attacker may be able to put together enough information to infiltrate an organization's network. If an attacker is not able to gather enough information from one source, the attacker may contact a source within the same organization and rely on the information from the first source to add to his or her credibility.3 Often, these actions are used together with other types of cyber threats and can be conducted through both technical and nontechnical means.

Solicitation and bribery were the most common type of social engineering tactic, used in 74 percent of social engineering breaches. Solicitation and bribery frequently entail collusion between an external agent and an insider. One party uses petitions, promises, and payments to get another to participate in the crime.4

Pretexting

Pretexting was used in 44 percent of social engineering breaches. Pretexting is the practice of getting an individual's personal information under false pretenses using a variety of tactics. The pretexter may be able to obtain personal information including a Social Security number, bank and credit card account numbers, information in a credit report, and the existence and size of savings and investment portfolios. However, some information about an individual may be a matter of public record, including whether they own a house, pay their real estate taxes, or have ever filed for bankruptcy. It is not pretexting for another person to collect this kind of information.5

Counterfeiting and forgery were used in 16 percent of social engineering breaches and can involve everything from websites to documents (e.g., the use of fake credentials (driver's licenses, birth certificates, etc.)).6

Phishing

Phishing attacks were used in 11 percent of social engineering breaches. Phishing attacks use e-mail or malicious websites to solicit personal information by posing as a trustworthy organization. For instance, an attacker may send e-mail appearing to be from a reputable credit card company or financial institution that requests account information, often suggesting that there is a problem. When users respond with the requested information, an attacker can use it to gain access to the accounts. Phishing attacks may also appear to come from other types of organizations, like charities. Attackers often take advantage of current events and certain times of the year, including: (1) natural disasters (e.g., Hurricane Katrina), (2) epidemics and health scares (e.g., H1N1), (3) economic concerns (e.g., Internal Revenue Service scams), (4) major political elections, and (5) holidays.7 Interestingly, phishing attacks are being used more often to gain a toehold in the victim's environment through attached malware.

Spear Phishing

Spear phishing involves targeted e-mails that typically are used as a catalyst for individuals to click on hyperlinks or open attachments, allowing the downloading of malicious content to the user's device and the unauthorized entry into an organization's network. Business activities and products that could be leveraged by an attacker to develop targeted e-mails addressed to individuals within an organization include:

  • media releases,
  • business mergers and acquisitions,
  • business reports/stock reports/financial statements,
  • competing for contracts,
  • awarded contracts,
  • technological breakthroughs,
  • international dealings,
  • other public information of interest to malicious actors,
  • natural disasters,
  • referred to by other parties in their public release statements,
  • government/industry events,
  • government or industry work stoppages,
  • and international or political events.8

12011 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report.

22011 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report.

3National Cyber Alert System: Cyber Security Tip ST04–001 (Oct. 22, 2009).

42011 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report.

5Federal Trade Commission, Facts for Consumers, Pretexting: Your Personal Information Revealed (Apr. 24, 2009).

62011 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report.

7National Cyber Alert System: Cyber Security Tip ST04–001 (Oct. 22, 2009).

8National Cybersecurity & Communications Integration Center Advisory, Targeted Phishing Attacks (Apr. 6. 2011).


Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

Advertisements
    
 
© 2000-2012 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.