Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Expand Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Expand D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Expand Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Expand Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Collapse Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Contractor's Guide to OCIPsContractor's Guide to OCIPs
Expand Construction Risk Conference HandoutsConstruction Risk Conference Handouts
Collapse Free Construction CommentaryFree Construction Commentary
Expand Builders Risk InsuranceBuilders Risk Insurance
Expand Construction Defect CoverageConstruction Defect Coverage
Expand Construction Liability InsuranceConstruction Liability Insurance
Expand Construction Quality InsuranceConstruction Quality Insurance
Expand Construction SafetyConstruction Safety
Collapse Design LiabilityDesign Liability
Mitigation of Damages Coverage (September 2011)
Illinois Supreme Court Rejects an Expert Witness's Expanded Duty of Care (May 2011)
Failing To Define the Standard of Care (January 2011)
Take Advantage of Project Excess Endorsements (January 2011)
Project Professional Liability Insurance for Construction Firms (November 2009)
Understanding Contractor's Protective Insurance (June 2009)
The 2007 AIA Document: Changes in Formal Dispute Resolution (May 2009)
Design Professional's Attention to Contract Clauses Can Pay Dividends (September 2008)
Contractors Professional Liability Market Update (June 2008)
Owners Protective Professional Indemnity Insurance (March 2008)
Protection of Architectural Plans (September 2007)
Contractors Professional Liability Update (August 2007)
Project Professional Liability Insurance Alternatives (June 2007)
Contractor's Professional Liability and the CGL (March 2007)
Remote Relations and Legal Duties of Design Professionals (September 2006)
Trying To Do the Right Thing: Self-Preservation by Good Faith Decision Making (March 2006)
Are You Really Protected from Consequential Damages Exposure? (November 2005)
Higher Policy Limits for Specific Projects (October 2005)
Negligent Misrepresentation and the Economic Loss Doctrine (July 2005)
The "Bargained-for" Result: Torts, Contracts, and Statutes of Limitation (June 2005)
Unexpected Hazardous Materials—What Do You Do When the Owner Says "Keep Going"? (April 2005)
Dealing with Ambiguities in Design-Build Contracts (January 2005)
Design-Build Teammates—Who Pays Liquidated Damages First? (October 2004)
Design-Builder Not Entitled to Equitable Adjustment (September 2004)
Making the Most of Standard Indemnity Clauses (June 2004)
Standards Needed for Mold Exposure, Testing, and Remediation (April 2004)
Insurer Uses Contractual Liability Exclusion To Deny Coverage (June 2003)
The Ability To Disclaim Liability Resulting from Inspection Duties (May 2003)
Capping Damages Against Design-Builders (March 2003)
Copyright Infringement of Design Documents (November 2002)
Design Disclaimers and Implied Warranties (November 2002)
Insurance Coverage—Waivers of Subrogation (August 2002)
Stumbling Blocks to the Defense of Torts and Contractual Indemnity Claims (July 2002)
Contract Documents of the Design-Build Institute of America (May 2002)
Public Agency Exempted Project from Competitive Bidding (February 2002)
Architects and "Design and Construct" Liability under the ADA (December 2001)
Problems with Arbitration in Design-Build (November 2001)
The Design Professional's Responsibility for Job Site Injuries (September 2001)
Design-Build Engineer Held Liable for Negligence (July 2001)
Design Professional Liable for Approving Payment Absent a Bond (June 2001)
Superfund Decision May Benefit Design Builders (April 2001)
The Design Professional's Protection under the Economic Loss Doctrine (March 2001)
Professional Liability: Are Contractors Adequately Protected? (December 2000)
What Is Subrogation ... and Why Is My Contract Waiving It? (December 2000)
AIA Standard Form Is an Acceptable "Allocation of Risk" (September 2000)
Insurance for Architect- and Engineer-Led Design-Build Projects (August 2000)
Project-Specific Professional Liability: Who Really Pays for Design Errors? (May 2000)
The Design Professional's Obligation of Good Faith (May 2000)
Expand Equipment Theft PreventionEquipment Theft Prevention
Expand SuretySurety
Expand Wrap-Up ProgramsWrap-Up Programs
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Expand Claims, Caselaw, LegalClaims, Caselaw, Legal
Expand Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements
Support

Owners Protective Professional Indemnity Insurance

March 2008

Even though the professional liability marketplace has expanded somewhat over the past few years, and in 2008 we will definitely see rate decreases, most of this news resides with practice or corporate programs. When it comes to insuring professional liability on a project-specific basis, construction project owners still have few alternatives.

by Jeff Slivka and Tony Polini
New Day Underwriting Managers

The first—and most recognized—alternative is a project professional liability program that insures the design team, and may include the contracting firms that are performing certain professional services. Only two insurers are willing to offer project professional liability coverage even if they are not providing the firm's corporate or practice insurance program. They are Lexington Insurance Company and Zurich Construction, via Steadfast Insurance Company. (Note: other insurers may offer project coverage but only if they are insuring their practice program.)

Each insurer's program has its benefits and drawbacks, and careful consideration must be given to identifying the primary beneficiary of coverage: architects, engineers, construction firms, owners, or all of the above. Many times, this can be a difficult task, if not impossible. Couple this with the high cost for project professional liability programs, and we see many project owners passing on project coverage and opting to rely merely on the design professionals' practice insurance. On sizeable projects, this may not be a prudent move.

The other option or insurance product that is gaining more and more attention with owners of construction projects is the owners' protective professional indemnity or OPPI policy. Offered to owners ("owner's protective") of construction projects who hold contracts with design professionals, the OPPI provides first-party indemnity to the owner (insured) for damage they incur as a result of negligence of the design professionals. It does not extend coverage to the design team so the possibility of defense cost eroding the limit of liability, which is usually a concern with a project professional liability program, is drastically reduced, if not eliminated. The OPPI is in the name of the owner and sits excess of the design professional's professional liability insurance and essentially supplements coverage and capacity that the design firms bring to the project via their practice programs. No design professionals are named to the policy.

At first, the major attraction to the OPPI is usually cost. Theoretically speaking, the premiums are usually 30 to 40 percent lower than a typical project professional liability placement. However, for owners of large construction projects that want to ensure they are protected properly from professional liability of the design team, there are numerous benefits, as outlined here.

  • All the benefits of having an owner-controlled program exist, such as primary protection for the named insured (owner), consistency in coverage, and reduced cost to administrate the program.
  • The policy supplements the design professional's professional liability program, providing direct benefits to the named insured, and allows the design professional to apply its own practice program. This eliminates potential coverage problems, such as separately insured project exclusions, that may arise when a project professional liability program replaces the design professional's practice program.
  • The policy offers difference-in-conditions (DIC) coverage above the underlying professional liability policy, extending coverage to the named insured in the event the underlying policy is deficient in coverage. Some good examples include mold exclusions, habitational exclusions, construction management exclusions, or contractual liability exclusions that may exist in a design professional's practice program.
  • Defense costs for third-party claims arising out of the design professional's services are provided to the named insured under a specific coverage part.
  • Contractor's pollution coverage can be included providing the named insured with excess coverage for pollution claims—including mold over the contractor's pollution liability coverage.
  • Coverage can be provided for the liability of the owner's professional services in the event the owner has an engineering/construction entity on staff.
  • The policy can be offered on a project-specific basis for the construction term plus up to 10 years on the extended reporting period (ERP) or annually for all construction ("blanket" coverage) of the named insured.
  • In the event the underlying design professional's policy is intact (limits and coverage) at the time of claim payment, the self-insured retention (SIR) under the "protective" policy does not apply. In other words, the SIR is "erodable" by recovered design professional's available limit.
  • It can be an effective alternative for those owners requiring design builders and general contractors to secure professional liability from their design professionals.
  • Limits of liability can be secured up to $25 million with one single insurer. Higher limits may be obtained through use of multiple insurers.

Markets

There are only a few insurers offering "protective" policies: Lexington Insurance Company, Zurich Construction/Steadfast Insurance Company, and Arch Insurance Group have been offering the product for some time. However, in 2007 Beazley USA began offering OPPI as well.

All insurers have capacity up to $10 million however; Zurich is the only one with $50 million in capacity. Zurich is probably the insurer with the most experience in OPPI having offered the product for over 10 years. Coverage terms and conditions can vary, so it is imperative that a sound understanding of the contractual relationship between the named insured and the design professional exists prior to pursuing the coverage.

As this product continues to evolve, look for it to become a more desired option for owners than the alternatives currently available to them.


Tony Polini is Assistant Vice President of New Day Underwriting Managers in Bordentown, NJ.& He can be reached at (609) 298-3516 ext. 107 or at .


Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

Advertisements
    
 
© 2000-2012 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.