Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Expand Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Collapse D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Collapse Free Expert CommentaryFree Expert Commentary
Collapse Employment LawEmployment Law
New EEOC Guidance on Waivers of Discrimination Claims (August 2009)
Do Employee Layoffs Equal Litigation? (April 2009)
Should Employers "Google" Applicants? (February 2009)
Eleventh Circuit Court Requires Comparables "Similarly Situated in All Respects" (December 2008)
Recent Employee-Friendly Court Decisions (September 2008)
Downsizing Risk Management: RFOA as an Affirmative Defense (August 2008)
"Associational" Discrimination Claims a Growing Concern for Employers (May 2008)
New York Steps Up Employment Compliance Oversight (February 2008)
Age Discrimination Legal Update (December 2007)
States Expand Employee Protection to Families of Servicemen (August 2007)
NY Court Refuses To Extend FLSA Enterprise Liability to Nonprofits (June 2007)
Special Rules on Release Agreements for Workers Raise Questions and Create Litigation Risks (March 2007)
How Companies Are Bracing for EEOC Class Action Initiative Goals (February 2007)
Responding to an Unauthorized Breach of Electronic Personal Information (November 2006)
Complying with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986: A Challenging Task (October 2006)
"Simple Logic" Precludes Ambiguity in Offer Letter's at-Will Clause (September 2006)
Supreme Court Loosens Standard in Retaliation Lawsuits (July 2006)
2005 Workplace Survey Shows Decrease in Lawsuits (June 2006)
Wage-Hour Update: Class Actions on the Rise (March 2006)
Taylor v. Progress Energy Affects FMLA Rights (December 2005)
The Changing Definition of Protected Concerted Activity (June 2005)
Supreme Court Allows Age Discrimination Claims Based on Disparate Impact (April 2005)
California Enacts Sexual Harassment Training Statute (December 2004)
Visa Revalidation Process Terminated by the Department of State (August 2004)
New Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Proposed (May 2004)
Time To Reevaluate Employee Bonus and Incentive Plans? (April 2004)
Department of Labor Issues Proposed Regulations on COBRA Notices (March 2004)
Supreme Court To Consider Employer Policies (December 2003)
ADA Requirements in "Direct Threat" Determination (August 2003)
Labor Department Proposes Wage Changes (June 2003)
The Dangers of "Post-Injury" Drug and Alcohol Testing (February 2003)
New York Extends Civil Rights Protections to Gays and Lesbians (January 2003)
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Expanded Whistleblower Protection (November 2002)
Managing RIFs during Tough Economic Times (October 2002)
ADA Doesn't Require Employer To Violate Its Seniority Policy (May 2002)
Supreme Court Clarifies EEOC's Role in Arbitration Disputes (February 2002)
Failure To Train about Age Discrimination Results in Employer Liability (January 2002)
Military Leave Rights: Obligations for Employers (December 2001)
Compelling Arbitration of Employee Claims under the Federal Arbitration Act (June 2001)
The New OSHA Ergonomics Program Standard (January 2001)
Top 10 Best Employment Practices for the New New Economy (December 2000)
Nonunion Employees Gain Right to Representation during Investigations (August 2000)
Supreme Court Lowers the Bar in Proving Discrimination (July 2000)
Leave and Reassignment under the ADA (March 2000)
Expand Healthcare Professional Liability InsuranceHealthcare Professional Liability Insurance
Expand Intellectual Property LawIntellectual Property Law
Expand Professional, D&O, and Fiduciary LiabilityProfessional, D&O, and Fiduciary Liability
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Expand Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Expand Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Expand Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Expand Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements
Support

Complying with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986: A Challenging Task

October 2006

Employers should not request employment documentation or ask candidates to complete the I-9 form before their first day of work. Prescreening potential employees by requiring them to show immigration documentation prior to hire may lead to discrimination in denying work-authorized individuals a job due to their nationality or other protected category.

by Paul J. Siegel, Esq.
Jackson Lewis LLP

To ensure compliance with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) I-9 regulations, new employees should not be asked to show specific documents when completing I-9 employment eligibility verification, regardless of whether they are or appear to be from a foreign country. This rule applies because the law requires only that the employer show the list of acceptable documents to the employee at the time of hire and allow the employee to decide what documentation from the list to present.

Employers may not determine which documents must be tendered to prove lawful work status or identity so long as the employee submits acceptable documentation from the list on the I-9 form; the document or documents appear to be authentic; and the document or documents relate to the person presenting them. If a worker produces documents which contradict any statement in the attestation section of the I-9 form (regarding whether they are a U.S. Citizen, Legal Permanent Resident, or Alien authorized to work until a specific date), the employer should point out the inconsistency and ask the employee to correct the error or explain the discrepancy. A Social Security card may be requested specifically for payroll purposes, not in the I-9 employment eligibility verification context.

Copies of employment eligibility documentation are not required to be made by the IRCA. Employers have the option to make and attach copies of this documentation to the employee's I-9 form, or not to take copies. The key is consistency, i.e., employers should not make copies of documents only for certain employees. It is generally recommend that copies be made to ensure that there is proof of a good-faith review of the documents tendered, but care must be taken to ensure that only those documents the employee is relying on for employment eligibility purposes are kept with the I-9 form.

This means that if the employee produces a permanent resident card (a.k.a. "Green Card") for the I-9 form, and a Social Security card for payroll purposes, only a copy of the Green Card should be attached to the I-9 form. Including the unnecessary additional document copy with the I-9 is considered unlawful "over-documentation."


Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

© 2000-2009 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.