Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Expand Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Expand D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Collapse Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Expand Risk Management -- Why and HowRisk Management -- Why and How
Collapse Free Expert CommentaryFree Expert Commentary
Expand Brand Equity and Product RecallBrand Equity and Product Recall
Expand Catastrophe Risk ManagementCatastrophe Risk Management
Expand Claims ManagementClaims Management
Expand Construction Case StudiesConstruction Case Studies
Expand Construction QualityConstruction Quality
Expand Construction SafetyConstruction Safety
Expand Corporate AviationCorporate Aviation
Expand Corporate Fraud PreventionCorporate Fraud Prevention
Expand Courts and CoverageCourts and Coverage
Expand Cyber InsuranceCyber Insurance
Expand Drafting and Interpreting Insurance PoliciesDrafting and Interpreting Insurance Policies
Expand Enterprise Risk ManagementEnterprise Risk Management
Expand Environmental Risk ManagementEnvironmental Risk Management
Expand EthicsEthics
Expand Global ImpactGlobal Impact
Expand Insurance ArchaeologyInsurance Archaeology
Expand InternalControlInternalControl
Expand Litigation ManagementLitigation Management
Expand MaritimeLawMaritimeLaw
Expand MediationMediation
Expand Political RiskPolitical Risk
Expand Privacy IssuesPrivacy Issues
Collapse ReinsuranceReinsurance
Playing the Name Game—An Update on Cut-Through Clauses (August 2009)
Third-Party Guarantees of Reinsurance Obligations: I Guarantee It! (June 2009)
Clash Cover Reinsurance and Economic Catastrophe Losses (March 2009)
Turnabout Is Fair Play—Reinsurers Now Have Credit-Risk Worries (December 2008)
Where Has Traditional Reinsurance Gone? (August 2008)
Consolidation Issues in Reinsurance Contracts (June 2008)
Reinsurancese—Time for a Change? (March 2008)
Keeping the Information Flowing: Loss Notice and Reporting Clauses in Reinsurance Contracts (February 2008)
Adventures in Reinsurance Contract Wording (October 2007)
When the Government Is Your Reinsurer (June 2007)
The Honorable Engagement Clause (But I Thought I Had a Legal Contract!) (March 2007)
The Strain To Retain (December 2006)
How To Make Friends with Your Reinsurer (September 2006)
Reinsurance Arbitration—A Primer (June 2006)
Stuck in the Middle—The Reinsurance Intermediary (March 2006)
Contract Finality—What a Concept! (January 2006)
Avoiding the Reinsurance Credit Risk (September 2005)
The Late Notice Defense in Reinsurance—Updated (June 2005)
Should I Stay or Should I Go Now? (March 2005)
The Naked Truth—The Reinsurer's Right to Information (December 2004)
Multiyear Policies and Annualization of Reinsurance Limits (September 2004)
Insurer Insolvency and Reinsurance (July 2004)
Follow-the-Fortunes Updated (April 2004)
Up-Front about Reinsurance (January 2004)
Understanding the Business-Covered Clause in a Reinsurance Contract (November 2003)
To Commute or Not To Commute, that Is the Question (July 2003)
Who Owes Whom? Understanding Setoffs in Reinsurance (March 2003)
When Errors Occur in a Reinsurance Relationship (December 2002)
Late Notice in Reinsurance Claims: Does Prejudice Matter? (September 2002)
Sorting Out the Reinsurance Contract Morass (March 2002)
If It Looks Like a Claim and Sounds Like a Claim, Is It a Claim for Reinsurance Purposes? (January 2002)
Understanding Reinsurance Terminology—Follow-the-Fortunes (October 2001)
The Trouble with Giving Away the Pen (June 2001)
Cut-Through Provisions in Reinsurance Agreements (March 2001)
The Reinsurance Relationship—How Special Is It? (December 2000)
Adventures in Contract Wording: The Effect of Ambiguous Reinsurance Contract Language (September 2000)
Are Punitive Damage Awards Recoverable under Reinsurance Agreements? (June 2000)
Reinsurance Matters (March 2000)
Expand Risk Management TechnologyRisk Management Technology
Expand SecuritySecurity
Expand Terrorism Risk Management & InsuranceTerrorism Risk Management & Insurance
Expand IRMI InsightsIRMI Insights
Expand IRMI Update Newsletter ArchivesIRMI Update Newsletter Archives
Expand Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Expand Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Expand Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements
Support

Stuck in the Middle—The Reinsurance Intermediary

March 2006

The reinsurance industry is made up of two major market components. First, you have the direct reinsurance market, which includes a smallish number of large professional reinsurance companies that negotiate and deal directly with ceding insurers without any assistance from third parties. Second, you have the broker reinsurance market, which includes a much larger number of reinsurance companies of varying sizes.

by Larry P. Schiffer
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae LLP

In the broker market, there are no direct dealings between the ceding insurer and the reinsurer. Instead, a reinsured's access to the broker reinsurance market is only through a reinsurance broker, which the industry often calls a reinsurance intermediary. This Commentary will discuss some of the legal aspects of the reinsurance intermediary relationship to both ceding insurers and reinsurers.

What's It All about?

There have been brokers in the insurance industry probably from its very beginnings. When the first insured risks began being reinsured by others willing to assume a share of the original risk, it is likely that a broker was there to introduce the original insurer to the reinsurer. In the London market, where reinsurance effectively began, it is the reinsurance intermediary who, on behalf of the ceding insurer, works through the reinsurance market by visiting the reinsurance underwriters individually and providing them with the basic details of the business to be reinsured.

Essentially, the reinsurance intermediary is a go-between, whose function it is to bring together the reinsured and reinsurer to secure a contract of reinsurance on terms agreeable to both parties. The reinsurance intermediary often will assist the reinsured in planning and developing its reinsurance program, put together the reinsurance proposal (called the placing information) and relevant premium and loss statistics to present to the reinsurance market when soliciting for reinsurers, propose to the reinsured the reinsurers to solicit, solicit those reinsurers on the reinsured's behalf, and prepare the reinsurance slip and, eventually, the reinsurance contract wording, that will be presented to the reinsurance market for agreement. The reinsurance intermediary does all of this for a brokerage fee, which is paid out of the premium ceded from the reinsured to the reinsurer.

Duty To Disclose

One of the most important aspects of the reinsurance intermediary's role during the placement of a reinsurance contract is to make sure all the material information about the underlying risk is disclosed to the reinsurer. The reinsurance intermediary should not pick and choose what it believes is relevant information from what the ceding insurer has supplied, but must present to the reinsurers all of the information obtained from the ceding insurer. The reinsurance intermediary must promptly transmit any questions, concerns, or requests for more information from the prospective reinsurer to the ceding insurer. Where all the information is flowing through the reinsurance intermediary about the proposed reinsurance deal, full and prompt disclosure is essential.

Maintaining the Reinsurance Relationship

Once the reinsurance has been placed, the reinsurance intermediary will act as a conduit between the reinsured and the reinsurer for the administration of the reinsurance contract. First, the reinsurance intermediary will make sure that the formal contract documentation is all prepared and signed by each party. Subsequent addenda or other changes to the reinsurance agreement will all flow through the reinsurance intermediary. The reinsurance intermediary's contract wording specialists handle the documentation aspect of the reinsurance arrangement.

Even before the contract wording is finalized, all reports, premiums, loss payment requests, loss payments, and reserve information pass through the reinsurance intermediary as part of its duties in maintaining the reinsurance relationship during the life of the reinsurance contract. Reinsurance accounting and claims specialists at the reinsurance intermediary will be responsible for these tasks.

These administrative service aspects are important to both the reinsured and the reinsurer. The reinsured need only report to the reinsurance intermediary and the reinsurance intermediary then takes care of allocating premiums and losses to the relevant reinsurers participating on the reinsured's reinsurance program. Conversely, the reinsurer does not need to maintain a large staff when the reinsurance intermediary will allocate to it the appropriate premium (less brokerage, of course) and will bill it the appropriate share of any losses. Smaller reinsurers rely heavily on the reinsurance intermediary for accounting and claims administration.

Continuing responsibility for administration, however, gets dicey when disputes arise or when one of the parties goes into runoff or into insolvency. While the reinsurance intermediary's brokerage fee is meant to compensate the reinsurance intermediary for its ongoing administrative obligations until all claims are settled, its financial incentive to continue with these tasks diminishes when the prospect of future business is eliminated by a dispute or runoff.

A related issue arises when the reinsured and reinsurer dispute some aspect of the reinsurance contract and the reinsurance intermediary is called on to produce documents and appear as a witness. In certain markets, the cooperation of the reinsurance intermediary is essential for the parties to resolve their dispute. In the London market, it may be the case that the reinsurance intermediary is the only source for the communications between the parties that could explain the parties' intent when they entered into the reinsurance contract. The reinsurance intermediary also may be the only source, or the most complete source, for the contract wording and its negotiation and drafting. While the reinsurance intermediary is not typically a party to the reinsurance contract, its cooperation may be requested by the reinsured or subpoenaed by the arbitration panel.

Regulation

In the United States, reinsurance intermediaries have been regulated since at least 1976. Most states have adopted a version of the Reinsurance Intermediary Model Act, promulgated by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. Under the Act, there are two categories of intermediaries: intermediary brokers and intermediary managers. Intermediary brokers are defined as any firm, association, or corporation who "solicits, negotiates, or places reinsurance cessions or retrocessions on behalf of a ceding insurer without having the authority or power to bind reinsurance on behalf of such insurer." Intermediary managers are those that have binding authority from the reinsurers and are really managing general agents or underwriters (see Commentary, The Trouble with Giving Away the Pen, June 2001).

The regulation of reinsurance intermediaries began with the bankruptcy of Pritchard & Baird, a major reinsurance intermediary in the early 1970s. Pritchard & Baird went bankrupt while holding funds paid to it by the reinsurer for claims due under a reinsurance contract. Unfortunately, those funds never made it to the reinsured. The reinsured sued the reinsurer for nonpayment, and the reinsurer defended that it had paid the loss payments to the reinsurance intermediary as the agent of the reinsured. The court refused to find that payment to Pritchard & Baird was payment to the reinsured. The reinsurer was forced to pay twice and had to absorb the credit risk of the intermediary.

Shortly afterward, the regulation of reinsurance intermediaries began in earnest, and the industry developed a clause for reinsurance contracts that specifically dealt with the credit risk associated with payment of funds to a reinsurance intermediary. Below is the current Brokers & Reinsurance Markets Association (BRMA) Intermediary Clause:

  • (Intermediary Name) is hereby recognized as the Intermediary negotiating this Contract for all business hereunder. All communications (including but not limited to notices, statements, premium, return premium, commissions, taxes, losses, loss adjustment expense, salvages and loss settlements) relating thereto shall be transmitted to the Company or the Reinsurer through (Intermediary Name and Address). Payments by the Company to the Intermediary shall be deemed to constitute payment to the Reinsurer. Payments by the Reinsurer to the Intermediary shall be deemed to constitute payment to the Company only to the extent that such payments are actually received by the Company.

The BRMA Intermediary Clause, as do most intermediary clauses in most reinsurance contracts, shifts to the reinsurer the credit risk of the reinsurance intermediary. The clause provides that payment by the reinsured to the reinsurance intermediary is payment to the reinsurer, but payments by the reinsurer to the intermediary are not payments to the reinsured unless the payments are actually received by the reinsured.

More Intense Regulation

Reinsurance intermediaries are now required to be licensed in most states. Penalties are imposed on unlicensed intermediaries. In some states, led by New York through its Regulation 98, reinsurance intermediaries must have written authorization from a reinsured before procuring reinsurance for the reinsured. The reinsurance intermediary must provide the reinsured with written proof that a reinsurer has agreed to assume the risk. The reinsurance intermediary also must inquire into the financial condition of the reinsurer and disclosed its findings to the reinsured.

Recordkeeping requirements also exist, mandating that the reinsurance intermediary keep a complete record of the reinsurance transaction for at least 10 years after the expiration of the reinsurance contract. Reinsurance intermediaries under these regulations are now responsible as fiduciaries for funds received as reinsurance intermediaries. Funds on reinsurance contracts must be kept in separate, identifiable accounts and may not be commingled with the reinsurance intermediaries' own funds.

Whose Agent Am I Anyway?

The general rule is that the reinsurance intermediary serves as the ceding insurer's agent. But there are aspects of the reinsurance intermediary's duties that may be viewed as acting, in part, on the reinsurer's behalf. A determination of agency will depend on the contractual relationships entered into and the facts surrounding the relationships. The scope of any agency may be spelled out in any written brokerage agreement between the ceding insurer and the reinsurance intermediary. Common law agency rules will still apply, however, to the actions taken by the reinsurance intermediary during the life of the reinsurance agreement.

Conclusion

The reinsurance intermediary has evolved from merely a "middle-man" that helped bring reinsurance contracting parties together to a highly regulated and integral part of the reinsurance industry. Most ceding insurers have formal agreements with their reinsurance intermediaries that set out the duties and expectations of both parties during the brokerage relationship. For certain ceding insurers, and for many reinsurers, working with the right reinsurance intermediary will be the key to a profitable reinsurance arrangement for all concerned parties.


Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

© 2000-2009 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.