Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Expand Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Expand D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Expand Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Collapse Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Collapse Free Risk Finance CommentaryFree Risk Finance Commentary
Collapse CaptivesCaptives
The Use of Captives in Wealth Management (January 2012)
Surplus Lines Insurance Taxation Remains Murky (October 2011)
Insurance Captives on Shifting Sands (July 2011)
Captive Domicile Selection Issues (April 2011)
A Cautionary Tale about Captive Risk Distribution (February 2011)
Stay Tuned into Your Captive Regulators (January 2011)
Evaluating Your Captive’s Capital and Surplus Requirements (December 2010)
Captive Managers—The Basics (October 2010)
Property Insurance Captives—A Funding Primer (August 2010)
Captives and Employee Benefits (July 2010)
Direct Procurement Revisited (April 2010)
Captive Underwriting Profits—without Third-Party Business (February 2010)
What Is Insurance, and Does a Captive Qualify? (January 2010)
The Captive/Large Deductible Debate—A Philosophical Perspective (December 2009)
Claims and the Captive (October 2009)
Do Captives Earn Profits? (August 2009)
Agency Captives Revisited (July 2009)
The Economic Bailout and Its Unintended Consequences (April 2009)
Captive Guideposts for 2009 (January 2009)
Things To Know about Captive Insurance Companies (November 2008)
Taxes and Insurance Captives (October 2008)
Captives: Domicile Shopping (August 2008)
Federal Proposals for Captive Insurance Regulation (April 2008)
Redomiciling Your Captive Insurer (February 2008)
Captive Insurance Exit Strategy (November 2007)
Captive Insurance Companies: Beware of New Treasury Proposal (October 2007)
Captives and Collateral (August 2007)
Windstorm Captives (April 2007)
Captives in Review (February 2007)
Captives and Corporate Governance (October 2006)
Insuring Property Risks in a Captive (October 2006)
Why You Should Start a Captive in a Soft Market (August 2006)
How To Choose a Domicile That Works Best for Your Captive (April 2006)
Investment Strategies for Captives (January 2006)
What Is Insurance? Where Are the Rules? (October 2005)
Regulation of Captives: Who? Why? What Next? (August 2005)
When Is Reinsurance Not Reinsurance? (April 2005)
Using Captives and Risk Retention Groups Together (January 2005)
Taking a Closer Look at Captive Costs (October 2004)
Some Cautionary Thoughts on Healthcare RRGs (August 2004)
Medical Malpractice and Alternative Risk (April 2004)
What's in Store for 2004 for Alternative Risk? (January 2004)
Risk Retention Group Formations Increase (October 2003)
The Role of the Domicile Manager (August 2003)
The "Fronting" Wars Continue (April 2003)
Captives, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, and the Market (January 2003)
Actuarial Projections and the Captive (November 2002)
Choosing the Right Captive Domicile (August 2002)
Captive Structures (April 2002)
Captives 101: What Are They, and Why Do I Want One? (January 2002)
Expand Quantitative MethodsQuantitative Methods
Expand Risk FinanceRisk Finance
Expand Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Expand Claims, Caselaw, LegalClaims, Caselaw, Legal
Expand Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements
Support

Why You Should Start a Captive in a Soft Market

August 2006

Many recent articles in the trade press have cited surveys talking about the softening insurance market. Liability rates have declined, property coverage is available, and underwriters are looking for business.

by Michael R. Mead
M.R. Mead & Company, LLC

Profits are up, and the future looks rosy for traditional insurers. Even some medical malpractice rates have declined noticeably. So, why would a business consider financing its own risk when so much risk transfer is available? This is a question frequently addressed by the captive community. It is a good question that goes to the heart of the captive philosophy and thus deserves a bit of attention.

Certainly thoughtful analysis must be given to the cost of transferring risk. When rates are low, perhaps a buyer should take advantage of the situation and purchase traditional risk transfer products. Establishing and running a captive involves heavy up-front costs and is dependent on some factors that may be difficult to influence let alone control. It is often a good choice to transfer the risk of loss to a larger firm with professional resources and capital.

However, if you believe that the industry remains subject to pricing cycles, then perhaps the best time to look into a change is when the market pricing is soft, and underwriters are accommodating and responsive.

Reasons To Move Now

There are several good reasons to consider launching your captive when the traditional market rate structure is on the down side. The first reason is that most of us believe that what goes down goes up. For risk and financial officers who are frustrated with an inability to forecast accurate risk costs into the future, a slowing insurance market is not always a good thing. Predictability is often valued more highly than soft rates followed by hard rates.

In my experience, insurance rates are frequently responsive to the overall economy. We know that there have been and believe that there will be again changes in the overall economy. Thus, I believe it is safe to assume that there will continue to be changes in insurance pricing. The pricing approach may not look like approaches in the past, but change they will.

If you have designed a business model with set costs and profits, and sold this model to investors/employees/the board/regulators, it is particularly frustrating to see costs fluctuate unpredictably. You likely want to take control of these costs. Captives are all about control. If you are able to accurately forecast costs into the future, your business will likely gain acceptance and profitability. If you can control the costs of operating your business, you can improve its overall results.

Another good reason to consider a captive in a soft market is to expand coverage lines for risks that are not covered in the traditional market. While the rates may have softened for basic insurance, there are still many exposures to loss which are not addressed completely. Terrorism remains an exposure which is not well addressed in the traditional market place, even as premiums have softened.

Employment liability and directors and officers coverage may not be affordable in a hard market, but perhaps the small, private company which has declined such coverage in the past can now write it in their own captive and obtain reasonable excess risk transfer. Construction industry risks, particularly in residential building, continue to face a lack of availability and a plethora of exclusions and restrictions. These exclusions and restrictions can render the coverage useless for lenders and other interested parties.

How To Move Forward

To take full advantage of the situation, I would suggest that a captive owner, or potential captive owner, analyze the cost of traditional products with a view to incorporating some of them into a captive program in which costs can be controlled and moved about depending on the then current state of the traditional market. Buy traditional risk transfer when it is cheap; move the coverage to your captive when it is dear. But the captive should be in existence and ready to perform when needed.

It is certainly easier to set up a captive and begin learning how to use it profitably when there is less pressure for it to address pressing needs. Get it up and running, learn about corporate governance, get to know your regulators and managers, and watch the performance of your risk sharing partners in a less demanding situation.

If excess costs have come down, consider a lower attachment point for that coverage. Lock-in the rate for an extended period. Underwriters are usually interested in adding new accounts and new lines of coverage when their pricing has reduced premium inflow.

Conclusion

All in all, one should consider the wisdom of being prepared, and making hay while the sun shines. When the market turns, and time is short to solve challenges, it won’t be as pleasant an experience to form a captive than when the pressure is nonexistent or lessened by the soft premiums.


Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.


More Risk Finance and Captives Information from IRMI
Books, Manuals, Newsletters IRMI
Online
ReferenceConnect
Risk Financing IRMI Online ReferenceConnect
Captive Insurance Company Reports IRMI Online ReferenceConnect
Captive Practices and Procedures IRMI Online ReferenceConnect
Captives and the Management of Risk IRMI Online ReferenceConnect
The Risk Report IRMI Online ReferenceConnect
Free Risk Financing Articles in IRMI.com
25 Risk-Conquering Ideas
Risk Finance
Captive Insurance
Additional Insured Insurance Law
Insurance Continuing Education Courses from IRMI
Ethics Considerations for P&C Insurance Professionals (CE)
Ethics in the P&C Insurance Workplace (CE)
Advertisements
    
 
© 2000-2012 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.