Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Expand Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Expand D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Expand Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Expand Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Expand Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Expand Claims, Caselaw, LegalClaims, Caselaw, Legal
Collapse Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Resource DirectoryResource Directory
Collapse Free Insurance Industry CommentaryFree Insurance Industry Commentary
Expand Agent & Broker Technology IssuesAgent & Broker Technology Issues
Expand Continuous Performance ImprovementContinuous Performance Improvement
Expand Eradicating Sales Call ReluctanceEradicating Sales Call Reluctance
Expand EthicsEthics
Expand Leadership at All LevelsLeadership at All Levels
Collapse Market PracticesMarket Practices
Divisor Programs Revisited (December 2011)
Nobody Knows You When You're Down and Out (September 2011)
Goodbye to the Soft Market (June 2011)
Alternative Risk Transfer in 2011 (February 2011)
Claims Administration—The Insurance Service (December 2010)
Insurance Market: Déjà Vu (September 2010)
Insurance Industry: A Return to Professionalism Needed (July 2010)
Insurance Regulation: Danger at the Door (April 2010)
Reinsurers Herald Underwriting Discipline (December 2009)
An Insurance Czar? I Don't Think So! (September 2009)
Trouble in Mind for the Insurance Industry (June 2009)
Marketplace Blues Reprise (March 2009)
Insurance Market Woes Continue (December 2008)
The Demise of the Current Insurance Market (September 2008)
Insurer Financial Security Is Not a Rating (June 2008)
Insurance Industry Sings the Back Door Blues (March 2008)
Risk Management Assessments and Peer Reviews (December 2007)
Is an Umbrella Just a Bumbershoot? (September 2007)
The Winning Team Concept (June 2007)
Is Offshore That Far from Shore? (March 2007)
Ho, Ho, Ho, and Say Good-Bye to 2006 (December 2006)
Is There a Reinsurance Paradigm? (September 2006)
Where Is the Market Going? (June 2006)
What To Do about Catastrophic Loss (January 2006)
Understanding Coverage from Dawn's Early Light (December 2005)
Marketplace Blues (September 2005)
Retrospective Rating Alternative (July 2005)
It's 2005—Do You Know Where Your Market Is? (March 2005)
Finite Insurance: Is the Criticism Warranted? (December 2004)
Medical Malpractice: Things To Consider (October 2004)
Little Things Mean a Lot (May 2004)
Loss Forecasting/Submissions (March 2004)
Excess Follow Form versus Umbrella (December 2003)
Certificates of Insurance (September 2003)
Thinking Outside the Box (July 2003)
Binders and Confirmation (May 2003)
Considering Alternative Risk Transfer (February 2003)
Insurance Coverage Specifications in the Hard Market (December 2002)
What Constitutes a Full Underwriting Submission? (October 2002)
Agents and Brokers as Consultants: Conflict of Interest or Value-Added Service? (June 2001)
Expand ReinsuranceReinsurance
Expand Risk and Insurance HistoryRisk and Insurance History
Expand RMI Higher Education SceneRMI Higher Education Scene
Expand U.S. Insurance Market UpdateU.S. Insurance Market Update
Expand Valuation of Insurance OrganizationsValuation of Insurance Organizations
Expand Writing Tips for Insurance ProfessionalsWriting Tips for Insurance Professionals
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements
Support

Retrospective Rating Alternative

July 2005

A few days ago I received an e-mail from one of IRMI's readers, which referred to a prior article that I wrote on loss forecasting. The question on the table had to do with a loss picture which an insurer foisted on the insured, after having actuarially trended and developed their combined commercial liability and commercial automobile experience over a protracted period of time. In actuality, the loss pic was quite reasonable.

by Peter M. Polstein

The reader wanted to discuss alternatives other than guaranteed cost which was the current program, and felt that neither self-insured retentions nor deductibles provided a satisfactory alternative as premium credits were not supportive of the increased risk taken on the part of his client. His client was not at all interested in any retrospective rating programs, simply due to the potential of long-term adjustments.

I called back, talked for a bit and I said, "Have you ever considered a divisor program?"

His answer was, "Not really." Okay, divisors have been around the insurance industry for years. I utilized them frequently at Alexander & Alexander, and they are really a simple alternative to what is a myriad of loss sensitive programs, where adjustments have the habit of driving both client and agent/broker nuts.

The Divisor Example

Assume the insured's guaranteed cost was $2 million per annum, which now becomes unity premium, based in part on the underwriter's concern that the risk had the potential for catastrophic loss. In fact, over a 3-year period, the actual loss pic averaged $500,000. I said, ask the underwriter for a divisor of 60 percent, which would provide the underwriter with the reciprocal of 40 percent or $800,000 which covers boards, bureaus, taxes, profit, administration and loss costs, and represents minimum premium, irrespective of losses.

Underwriters will then ask for a deposit premium which represents a negotiated value of trended and developed losses, or perhaps something in-between. Let's assume a loss pic of $500,000; the insured's premium would be $500,000 or a $1.5 million cash flow benefit. There is also the possibility that underwriters may demand some collateral to make up the difference between the actual loss pic whose actuarial confidence level may be somewhat less than the perceived potential for loss. The only adjustment that is made will be paid losses divided by the 60 percent factor.

If you assume that the ultimate losses stay at say $500,000, then the total loss cost becomes $833,000 rounded off. If all of the assumptions held, the insured's total annual premium would be $1,633 million (minimum plus loss costs) providing both a cash flow benefit and additional savings of $367,000. On the other hand, if the experience went south, then underwriters would have no less than the $2 million they would have derived from the guaranteed cost program.

Conclusion

You might ask, why would underwriters entertain this sort of program? Why not? It provides protection for the underwriter, and while their written premium will suffer to some degree, there is the likelihood of having a client as a long-term partner.


Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

Advertisements
    
 
© 2000-2012 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.