Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Collapse Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Collapse Free Commercial Liability CommentaryFree Commercial Liability Commentary
Expand Additional Insured IssuesAdditional Insured Issues
Collapse EnvironmentalEnvironmental
Asbestos Damages Excluded under Property Policy (January 2012)
Insuring Completed Operations Pollution Risks (January 2012)
Emergency Response Costs in Pollution Liability Policies (August 2011)
Judgment Day Comes in Global Warming Litigation (February 2011)
Green Building Projects and Environmental Risk (January 2010)
No CGL Coverage for Chimney Repairs Due to Carbon Monoxide Leakage (January 2011)
CGL Pollution Exclusion Applies to Dust and Diesel Fumes (December 2010)
In a Year of Skepticism, Global Warming Is Still a Timely Topic (November 2010)
Mold from a Covered Concurrent Cause Still Excluded (November 2010)
Pollution Exclusion Found Inapplicable (May 2010)
An Update on Chinese Drywall Claims (April 2010)
CGL Policy Held To Cover Oil Spill Cleanup Costs (April 2010)
Mold Damage to Contractor's Nondefective Work Caused by Subcontractor May Be Covered under Prime Contractor's Umbrella Policy (January 2010)
CGL Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Injury from Carbon Monoxide Released from Heater (December 2009)
Insurer and Environmental Consultant Have No Duty To Warn of Mold (July 2009)
No Coverage in Homeowner's Policy for Mold Damage from Water Pipe Leak (May 2009)
Construction Debris Is Excluded Pollutant (February 2009)
Pollution Legal Liability Market Update (July 2008)
"Damages" under a 1973 CGL Insurance Policy (April 2008)
"Suits" under a 1973 CGL Insurance Policy (February 2008)
Common Law Exceptions to the 1973 "Owned Property" Exclusion (January 2008)
Epoxy Fumes Excluded by CGL Insurance (November 2007)
Contractors Pollution Liability Update (October 2007)
Allocating Losses under a 1973 CGL (September 2007)
Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Dirt and Rocks (March 2007)
Pollution Exclusions in CGL Policy Bars Coverage for Carbon Monoxide Poisoning (February 2007)
Naturally Occurring Hazards: They Can Be "Hazardous" to Your Contractors Pollution Liability Coverage (January 2007)
Mold Is Not Covered as an Ensuing Loss of Leaking Water (January 2007)
Promoting Insurance-Based Solutions to Brownfield Redevelopment Challenges (November 2006)
Financing Environmental Loss with Environmental Insurance (October 2006)
Premium Instead of Prayer Needed for Mold Coverage (July 2006)
Mold Litigation: Expert Testimony Required to Prove Causation (April 2006)
Subrogation and Intervention in Construction Defect Case Involving Water and Mold (February 2006)
Environmental Insurance Helps Create Sustainable Development Out of "Brownfields" (December 2005)
Absolute Pollution Exclusion in Contractors Policy Does Not Bar Coverage for Toxic Fume Injuries (November 2005)
Manganism? (October 2005)
Environmental Insurance as a FASB Fix (August 2005)
Silica Claim Barred by Total Pollution Exclusion in CGL Policy (August 2005)
Broad Pollution Exclusion Is Ambiguous: Lead Covered by Policy (May 2005)
Silica—The Next Environmental Issue (April 2005)
Whether Mold Cleanup Costs Are Covered Depends on Causation (April 2005)
Homeowners Policy Unambiguously Excluded Coverage for Mold (October 2004)
Environmental Liability Buyouts: A Developing Option (August 2004)
Development of Environmental Risk Profiles for Construction Firms (July 2004)
Managing the Environmental Risk from Subcontractors (May 2004)
Seven Tips on Mold Management Programs (November 2003)
Environmental Due Diligence: The Information Is Everywhere! (May 2003)
The New Reality of Risk: Environmental Toxic Torts (May 2003)
Insured Fixed-Price Contracts and Environmental Cleanup (April 2003)
Managing Environmental Liabilities through Contracts (January 2003)
Environmental Insurance Changes the Game for Commercial Lenders (December 2002)
Environmental Risk in Retail: Exposures and Solutions (October 2002)
The Environmental Risks of Residential Construction (October 2002)
A Mold Prevention Program (July 2002)
Navigating the U.S. Environmental Liability Market (Part 2) (March 2002)
Navigating the U.S. Environmental Liability Market (Part 1) (March 2002)
The Pitfalls of Accepting Contaminated Fill (March 2002)
Mold: The Newest Environmental Hazard (September 2001)
Conducting Proper Environment Risk Assessments (July 2001)
Introduction to ISO 14001 (April 2001)
Brownfield Redevelopment: A Risk versus Reward Proposition (December 2000)
Colleges and Universities: Changing Your "School of Thought" When It Comes to Environmental Liability (October 2000)
Lenders and Environmental Liability (September 2000)
There's a Fungus Among Us (June 2000)
The U.S. Environmental Liability Insurance Market (May 2000)
Hidden Environmental Exposures of the Construction Industry (March 2000)
Expand Liability InsuranceLiability Insurance
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Expand D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Expand Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Expand Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Expand Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Expand Claims, Caselaw, LegalClaims, Caselaw, Legal
Expand Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements
Support

Environmental Insurance Helps Cities Create Sustainable Development Out of "Brownfields"

December 2005

Two New Jersey cities are using environmental insurance to turn large polluted areas into environmental models that reduce greenhouse gases, improve wildlife habitat, and provide other environmental improvements.

by Michael O. Hill*
Hill & Kehne, LLC

Many American cities have waterfronts, landfills, and other very large areas (e.g., 50 to 1,000 acres) that are unused or underused because of pollution. Known as "brownfields," these areas may bar citizens from their own waterfronts and other natural resources. Often the principal obstacle to redevelopment is the risk that environmental unknowns pose to redevelopment capital. Environmental insurance can reduce those risks, and the large scale of these projects allows cities to go beyond cleanup and actually improve the environment by, for example, reducing greenhouse gases; improving wildlife habitat; and/or creating model small-scale treatment and power systems.

Two New Jersey communities—one in the Meadowlands and one in Camden—are proving this can be done and providing a roadmap. They are doing so with the help of one deeply capitalized and environmentally focused developer, Cherokee Investment Partners, LLC.

The Meadowlands: Greenhouse Gas Reductions

In the N.J. Meadowlands—located along the N.J. Turnpike and adjacent to the New York Giants stadium—sit six landfills, some still active and some orphaned 30 years ago. As is true of many landfills, they are filled with a mixture of municipal and construction wastes that, in addition to taking up valuable space, slowly release methane gas into the atmosphere (methane is a greenhouse gas 23 times more harmful than carbon dioxide). The environmental unknowns in the landfill are numerous and substantial, e.g., What, exactly, was disposed there? To what extent might contaminated groundwater under the landfills be carrying contamination to neighboring properties? What, exactly, will the government require to do the cleanup under today's laws? How about tomorrow's laws?

Environmental insurance—in this case, from AIG, the world's largest insurer—has been purchased to mitigate every one of those risks, and others. Cherokee bought the insurance and worked with the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission (NJMC) and with AIG to draft a customized "surplus lines" policy that fits exactly what the NJMC and Cherokee needed (not less, not more). Because those risks could be mitigated at a reasonable cost, Cherokee was able to invest substantial capital into this project.

Cherokee has probably undertaken more development of contaminated properties (over 300), and probably for longer (since the mid-1980s), than anyone else. This is exciting in itself. More exciting, however, is where Cherokee is heading now, looking not just to redevelop property in a way that does not harm the environment, but in ways that actually improves it. Led by Founding Partners Tom Darden and John Mazzarino, and supported by myriad experts, including world-renowned environmental ("Green") architect William McDonough, Cherokee is using its capital in novel and environmentally beneficial ways.

The scale of the Meadowlands project is such that Cherokee will be able to vacuum extract the methane gases that are in the landfills and pipe them to an onsite power generating plant. The capture and use of these gases is the environmental equivalent of permanently removing approximately 700,000 cars from the road.

Camden: Improved Eagle Habitat and Utility Models

Once voted America's most beautiful city, Camden, N.J., borders the eastern shore of Delaware River directly across from Philadelphia. For almost 40 years, however, much of its waterfront has been completely inaccessible to the city's residents. Housing a 90-acre long-closed landfill and several shuttered industrial sites, the waterfront is completely inaccessible to its residents, many of whom are unaware that their neighborhood abuts the river. For 25 years the city has wanted to open the waterfront; for 25 years, the environmental uncertainties and lack of capital have made that impossible.

Under the leadership of Melvin (Randy) Primas, the city's Chief Operating Officer, and with critical development capital and self-funded planning from Cherokee, Camden is pursuing a plan to clean up and redevelop close to 2 miles of waterfront (approximately 600 acres) with 5,000 units of mixed-use housing, a community center, marina, golf course, and other open areas.

A golf course, by itself, is in most cases not economically viable. In Camden, the golf course would serve three purposes:

  • to provide recreational opportunity;

  • to increase the purchase price of enough of the new homes to make the overall development viable; and, perhaps most unexpectedly,

  • to enhance the chances that a pair of bald eagles nesting along the city's waterfront can raise a viable chick.

The eagle pair began nesting in the Camden area in 2003. Their principal food source, however, is PCB- and DDT-contaminated fish from the highly polluted stretch of the Delaware River that sits between Camden and Philadelphia. As a result, state biologists must remove any egg laid by this pair, knowing it could not survive on its own. An egg that the State removed from the nest in 2004 and hatched in a lab days later produced an eaglet that died within days of suspected PCB toxicosis, and that had PCB or DDT congenital abnormalities.

With the environmental uncertainties reduced by insurance, and because of the enormous scale of the project, Camden and Cherokee have literally been able to build into their plans an alternative food source for the eagles. Golf course ponds will be created not just to improve the beauty and challenge of the course, but to hold fish that the eagles can eat.

Also because of the scale of the project, Camden and Cherokee intend to provide a novel application of self-sustainability. Under a concept known as "Camden-Off-the-Grid," the development will create its own water quality infrastructure. Cherokee is also exploring small-scale power sources. These facilities will be self-contained, lower-impact, environmental models.

In sum, because of their enormous size, these projects do more than simply reuse contaminated land and thus avoid the increasing problem of "urban sprawl." With the creative energy of city leadership combined with a knowledgeable, well-capitalized developer, these large projects can create models of environmentally sustainable redevelopment. More cities should try them.


*IRMI.com Expert Commentator Michael Hill is an attorney, insurance broker, and risk management consultant. Cherokee is a client of his firm.


Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

Advertisements
    
 
© 2000-2012 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.