Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Expand Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Collapse D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Collapse Free Expert CommentaryFree Expert Commentary
Collapse Employment LawEmployment Law
New EEOC Guidance on Waivers of Discrimination Claims (August 2009)
Do Employee Layoffs Equal Litigation? (April 2009)
Should Employers "Google" Applicants? (February 2009)
Eleventh Circuit Court Requires Comparables "Similarly Situated in All Respects" (December 2008)
Recent Employee-Friendly Court Decisions (September 2008)
Downsizing Risk Management: RFOA as an Affirmative Defense (August 2008)
"Associational" Discrimination Claims a Growing Concern for Employers (May 2008)
New York Steps Up Employment Compliance Oversight (February 2008)
Age Discrimination Legal Update (December 2007)
States Expand Employee Protection to Families of Servicemen (August 2007)
NY Court Refuses To Extend FLSA Enterprise Liability to Nonprofits (June 2007)
Special Rules on Release Agreements for Workers Raise Questions and Create Litigation Risks (March 2007)
How Companies Are Bracing for EEOC Class Action Initiative Goals (February 2007)
Responding to an Unauthorized Breach of Electronic Personal Information (November 2006)
Complying with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986: A Challenging Task (October 2006)
"Simple Logic" Precludes Ambiguity in Offer Letter's at-Will Clause (September 2006)
Supreme Court Loosens Standard in Retaliation Lawsuits (July 2006)
2005 Workplace Survey Shows Decrease in Lawsuits (June 2006)
Wage-Hour Update: Class Actions on the Rise (March 2006)
Taylor v. Progress Energy Affects FMLA Rights (December 2005)
The Changing Definition of Protected Concerted Activity (June 2005)
Supreme Court Allows Age Discrimination Claims Based on Disparate Impact (April 2005)
California Enacts Sexual Harassment Training Statute (December 2004)
Visa Revalidation Process Terminated by the Department of State (August 2004)
New Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Proposed (May 2004)
Time To Reevaluate Employee Bonus and Incentive Plans? (April 2004)
Department of Labor Issues Proposed Regulations on COBRA Notices (March 2004)
Supreme Court To Consider Employer Policies (December 2003)
ADA Requirements in "Direct Threat" Determination (August 2003)
Labor Department Proposes Wage Changes (June 2003)
The Dangers of "Post-Injury" Drug and Alcohol Testing (February 2003)
New York Extends Civil Rights Protections to Gays and Lesbians (January 2003)
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Expanded Whistleblower Protection (November 2002)
Managing RIFs during Tough Economic Times (October 2002)
ADA Doesn't Require Employer To Violate Its Seniority Policy (May 2002)
Supreme Court Clarifies EEOC's Role in Arbitration Disputes (February 2002)
Failure To Train about Age Discrimination Results in Employer Liability (January 2002)
Military Leave Rights: Obligations for Employers (December 2001)
Compelling Arbitration of Employee Claims under the Federal Arbitration Act (June 2001)
The New OSHA Ergonomics Program Standard (January 2001)
Top 10 Best Employment Practices for the New New Economy (December 2000)
Nonunion Employees Gain Right to Representation during Investigations (August 2000)
Supreme Court Lowers the Bar in Proving Discrimination (July 2000)
Leave and Reassignment under the ADA (March 2000)
Expand Healthcare Professional Liability InsuranceHealthcare Professional Liability Insurance
Expand Intellectual Property LawIntellectual Property Law
Expand Professional, D&O, and Fiduciary LiabilityProfessional, D&O, and Fiduciary Liability
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Expand Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Expand Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Expand Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Expand Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements
Support

Visa Revalidation Process Terminated by the Department of State

August 2004

The U.S. Department of State has ended business-related visa revalidation because it is unable to obtain the biometric identifiers all visas must contain as of October 26, 2004. Ending this type of revalidation will be an inconvenience to the international business community, necessitating their return to their home countries to revalidate visas.

by Paul J. Siegel, Esq.
Jackson Lewis LLP

The U.S. Department of State (DOS) has announced it is ending its program for visa revalidation for temporary nonimmigrants as of July 16, 2004. This information was announced in Public Notice 4747 from the Department of State and was reported at 69 Federal Register 35121 on June 23, 2004.

The revalidation program, originally designed to provide nonimmigrant services to foreign government officials, was eventually extended to include reissuance opportunities for several other classes of visa holders, i.e., C, E, H, I, L, O, and P. The service allowed these classes to renew their visas in the United States, thus relieving them of the burden of traveling back to their home countries to do so. The termination of the program will not affect the revalidation service for qualifying diplomatic and official visas in Washington, D.C., but only visa classes C, E, H, I, L, O, and P.

While the State Department realizes that this decision to end business-related visa revalidation will be an inconvenience to the international business community, the DOS is unable to overcome the lack of capacity domestically to continue the service. Specifically, the DOS is not able to obtain the biometric identifiers all visas must contain as of October 26, 2004. To lessen the inconveniences that inevitably will come with this termination, the State Department will implement a priority basis for assisting applicants of the revalidation process.

Only applications received at the St. Louis acceptance facility by the July 16, 2004, deadline are eligible for revalidation. An exception to the July 16 date will be made for pending applications for which additional information has been requested under INA Section 221(g) as of that date. The State Department has stressed that applicants should apply as soon as possible in their home countries, and reminds applicants that it is imperative to schedule interview appointments before traveling.

Although the State Department has said it has no plans to reinstate the revalidation process, the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), together with other business groups, plans to put pressure on the DOS to revive the process as soon as possible. Despite this planned effort, the AILA is not optimistic about the return of the process in the near future.


Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

© 2000-2009 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.