Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Expand Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Collapse D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Collapse Free Expert CommentaryFree Expert Commentary
Collapse Employment LawEmployment Law
New EEOC Guidance on Waivers of Discrimination Claims (August 2009)
Do Employee Layoffs Equal Litigation? (April 2009)
Should Employers "Google" Applicants? (February 2009)
Eleventh Circuit Court Requires Comparables "Similarly Situated in All Respects" (December 2008)
Recent Employee-Friendly Court Decisions (September 2008)
Downsizing Risk Management: RFOA as an Affirmative Defense (August 2008)
"Associational" Discrimination Claims a Growing Concern for Employers (May 2008)
New York Steps Up Employment Compliance Oversight (February 2008)
Age Discrimination Legal Update (December 2007)
States Expand Employee Protection to Families of Servicemen (August 2007)
NY Court Refuses To Extend FLSA Enterprise Liability to Nonprofits (June 2007)
Special Rules on Release Agreements for Workers Raise Questions and Create Litigation Risks (March 2007)
How Companies Are Bracing for EEOC Class Action Initiative Goals (February 2007)
Responding to an Unauthorized Breach of Electronic Personal Information (November 2006)
Complying with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986: A Challenging Task (October 2006)
"Simple Logic" Precludes Ambiguity in Offer Letter's at-Will Clause (September 2006)
Supreme Court Loosens Standard in Retaliation Lawsuits (July 2006)
2005 Workplace Survey Shows Decrease in Lawsuits (June 2006)
Wage-Hour Update: Class Actions on the Rise (March 2006)
Taylor v. Progress Energy Affects FMLA Rights (December 2005)
The Changing Definition of Protected Concerted Activity (June 2005)
Supreme Court Allows Age Discrimination Claims Based on Disparate Impact (April 2005)
California Enacts Sexual Harassment Training Statute (December 2004)
Visa Revalidation Process Terminated by the Department of State (August 2004)
New Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Proposed (May 2004)
Time To Reevaluate Employee Bonus and Incentive Plans? (April 2004)
Department of Labor Issues Proposed Regulations on COBRA Notices (March 2004)
Supreme Court To Consider Employer Policies (December 2003)
ADA Requirements in "Direct Threat" Determination (August 2003)
Labor Department Proposes Wage Changes (June 2003)
The Dangers of "Post-Injury" Drug and Alcohol Testing (February 2003)
New York Extends Civil Rights Protections to Gays and Lesbians (January 2003)
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Expanded Whistleblower Protection (November 2002)
Managing RIFs during Tough Economic Times (October 2002)
ADA Doesn't Require Employer To Violate Its Seniority Policy (May 2002)
Supreme Court Clarifies EEOC's Role in Arbitration Disputes (February 2002)
Failure To Train about Age Discrimination Results in Employer Liability (January 2002)
Military Leave Rights: Obligations for Employers (December 2001)
Compelling Arbitration of Employee Claims under the Federal Arbitration Act (June 2001)
The New OSHA Ergonomics Program Standard (January 2001)
Top 10 Best Employment Practices for the New New Economy (December 2000)
Nonunion Employees Gain Right to Representation during Investigations (August 2000)
Supreme Court Lowers the Bar in Proving Discrimination (July 2000)
Leave and Reassignment under the ADA (March 2000)
Expand Healthcare Professional Liability InsuranceHealthcare Professional Liability Insurance
Expand Intellectual Property LawIntellectual Property Law
Expand Professional, D&O, and Fiduciary LiabilityProfessional, D&O, and Fiduciary Liability
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Expand Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Expand Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Expand Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Expand Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements
Support

Department of Labor Issues Proposed Regulations on COBRA Notices

March 2004

Proposed regulation changes to the Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act or COBRA may affect employer notices to workers and their families regarding group health continuation coverage.

by Paul J. Siegel, Esq.
Jackson Lewis LLP

On May 28, 2003, the Employee Benefits Security Administration (formerly the Pension and Welfare Benefits Administration) of the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued proposed regulations regarding the various notices that must be furnished by employers, plan administrators, and workers and their families in connection with group health continuation coverage—commonly referred to as Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act or COBRA coverage.

The proposed regulations provide for the first time comprehensive guidance concerning the notice requirements under COBRA. The regulations would clarify some issues regarding the timing and content of the customary notices. They also provide model forms which, when properly used, will be deemed by the DOL to comply with the regulations. The regulations would update the DOL's last formal guidance published in Technical Release 86-2 and several subsequent advisory opinions and information letters.

Although the proposed regulations would go into effect January 1, 2004, recent DOL guidance stated that these regulations would not be effective sooner than 6 months following the date final regulation are issued. The DOL expects to issue final regulations in early 2004.

Background

COBRA requires most group health plans to give employees and certain members of their families ("Qualified Beneficiaries") the opportunity to continue their group health coverage for up to 36 months in certain situations where the coverage would otherwise end. Qualified Beneficiaries who elect this continuation coverage may be required to pay for the cost of such coverage, up to a maximum of 102 percent of the cost to the plan.

Certain events ("Qualifying Events") will trigger COBRA coverage if they cause the employee or family members to lose group health coverage, including:

  • Termination of employment or reduction in hours worked
  • Death of an employee
  • Divorce or legal separation from a spouse
  • Loss of status as a dependent under a group health plan

COBRA requires specific notices about the rights and obligations of employers, plan administrators, employees and/or beneficiaries before employees and beneficiaries can elect COBRA continuation coverage. These notices include:

  • A general notice given to employees and their spouses when they become covered by a plan;
  • A notice of the occurrence of a Qualifying Event to be furnished by plan administrators and employees or beneficiaries, where applicable; and
  • An election notice given by plans to individuals entitled to elect COBRA.

General COBRA Notice

The required content of the general notice is essentially unchanged—it should cover the basic information about COBRA that employees and their families need to know to protect their rights before a Qualifying Event occurs. The proposed regulations make three significant changes regarding distribution of the notice:

  1. The general notice must be provided to Qualified Beneficiaries within 90 days after coverage begins.
  2. The general notice may be included in the plan's summary plan description (SPD, provided the SPD is furnished within the 90-day time limit.
  3. The plan may use the proposed regulations' model notice, which will be deemed to be in compliance with the content requirements of the regulations.

Employer and Plan Administrator Notice of Qualifying Event

In general, the time frames within which employers must notify plan administrators, and plan administrators must notify Qualified Beneficiaries of Qualifying Events remain unchanged:

  • Employers have 30 days following the date of the Qualifying Event to notify plan administrators;
  • Plan administrators have 14 days following notice of the Qualifying Event to notify Qualified Beneficiaries; and
  • Where the employer is also the plan administrator, notice must be provided to Qualified Beneficiaries within 44 days of the Qualifying Event.

Note, however, that plans for which continuation coverage begins on the date that coverage is lost should use that date, rather than the date of the Qualifying Event, to determine when to provide the notice.

Employee and Family Member Notice of Qualifying Event

Under COBRA, Qualified Beneficiaries must notify plan administrators of certain Qualifying Events—divorce or legal separation and loss of dependent status under the plan. In addition to clarifying the timing of these notices, the proposed regulations require plans to establish reasonable procedures for Qualified Beneficiaries to follow when furnishing these notices. The adoption of the following general procedures would be deemed reasonable under the proposed regulations:

  • Include the notice procedures in the plan's SPD; and
  • Specify who has been designated to receive the notice, the means for giving the notice, and the required content of the notice.

Note, that in the absence of any such procedures, a default rule will apply under which it will be difficult to determine whether notice has been given. Also, the proposed regulations would require plans to accept notices that meet certain minimum content requirements.

Election Notice

Under the proposed regulations, the plan's COBRA election notice would contain all of the information individuals need to decide whether to elect COBRA coverage. For example, the election notice would have to describe:

  • Available health plan options, including conversion rights, if applicable
  • Premium payment requirements
  • The consequences of failing to elect COBRA
  • How COBRA coverage could be extended due to disability or a second qualifying event

The model election notice in the proposed regulations includes these requirements and will be deemed to be in compliance with the content requirements of these regulations.

Other Notices

The proposed regulations describe two additional instances where a plan must provide a notice:

  • If the plan administrator receives notice of a Qualifying Event and determines that an individual is not entitled to continuation coverage, the plan administrator must notify that individual as to why the individual is not entitled to elect continuation coverage. For example, if the plan administrator is notified of a divorce and the employee's child no longer satisfies the plan's rules governing dependent status, the plan administrator must provide notice accordingly.
  • If an individual's COBRA coverage is terminated earlier than the full time period for which COBRA must be made available (e.g., the employer no longer sponsors a group health plan), the plan must notify the individual.

What Should Employers Be Doing?

Effective with the issuance of these proposed regulations, using the notice contained in the DOL's Technical Release 86-2 is no longer in "good faith" compliance with the DOL regulations. If, however, that notice has been amended to include all of the changes in COBRA since Technical Release 86-2, the notice will be in compliance.

The Benefits Group is developing a general notice and election form consistent with the proposed regulations and will be recommending these forms be substituted for forms currently in use.

Employers should also review their COBRA procedures to ensure that: (1) general notices are distributed to new employees within 90 days after coverage begins; and (2) the new notices will be provided when necessary (see "Other Notices" section above). In addition, to avoid the default rules provided under the proposed regulation, employers should establish procedures for employees to follow when providing notice of divorce or legal separation and loss of dependent status under the plan. Finally, the proposed regulations present an opportunity for employers to review and correct, where necessary, their overall compliance with COBRA.


Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

© 2000-2009 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.