Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Expand Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Expand D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Expand Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Expand Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Expand Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Collapse Claims, Caselaw, LegalClaims, Caselaw, Legal
Collapse Free Claims, Caselaw & Legal CommentaryFree Claims, Caselaw & Legal Commentary
Expand Claims ManagementClaims Management
Expand Claims PracticesClaims Practices
Expand Courts and CoverageCourts and Coverage
Expand Insurance ArchaeologyInsurance Archaeology
Expand Litigation ManagementLitigation Management
Expand Maritime LawMaritime Law
Expand MediationMediation
Collapse Personal Lines ClaimsPersonal Lines Claims
Personal Lines Insurance Is Getting More Personal (January 2012)
Plaintiff Duties in Personal Lines Claims (November 2011)
Getting to the Bottom Line—Other Considerations To Analyze (October 2011)
Getting to the Bottom Line—Determination of Damages (August 2011)
Insurance Claims—Expecting the Unexpected (April 2011)
The Art and Skill of Analyzing Coverage (January 2011)
"Bewitching" Punitive Damages (October 2010)
Stress-Free Claims Adjusting (August 2010)
Claims in a Recovering Economy (May 2010)
The Art of Strategic Negotiation (January 2010)
"Green" Building Claim Implications (October 2009)
Claims Adjusting and the Laws of Immunity (July 2009)
Loss Payable in the Time of Foreclosures (April 2009)
Avoiding Bad Faith Allegations in Excess Loss Situations (January 2009)
Personal Lines Property Loss Adjusting—Achieving Excellence (October 2008)
Adjusting Residential House Fires (October 2004)
Residential Water Claims (July 2004)
Residential Property Adjusting (March 2004)
Auto Manufacturer Parts versus After-Market Parts: A Question of Quality (November 2001)
Expand Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements
Support

Residential Property Adjusting

March 2004

Handling personal lines claims for residences takes knowledge and finesse. In this new IRMI.com column, procedures and scoping the loss are explained.

by George Epps
Epps & Assoc. Inc.

Adjusters for personal lines claims face a unique combination of challenges from insureds, who might be quite upset or angry about their losses, and from the losses themselves, which may or may not be covered by the insureds' policies. To effectively oversee personal lines claims for residences, adjusters must possess a great deal of technical skill and knowledge, as well as public relations and interpersonal skills. The procedures the adjuster follows can ensure a successful claim result that will satisfy the insured as well as the insurer.

Making a Good Impression

When meeting with the insured to inspect the damages, the adjuster should be aware that perception goes a long way in settling the loss. The adjuster should have the proper dress of a businessperson and portray confidence. The insured will likely not know if the adjuster is experienced or a rookie. If the adjuster is poorly dressed and acts with indecision, the insured will question if he knows what he is doing and question his decisions.

The adjuster should be courteous and friendly and above all, a good listener. An effective adjuster allows the insured to talk. The adjuster's job is to get the facts of the loss, determine the damages, and settle with the insured. If the adjuster creates an adversarial situation, completing the settlement becomes more difficult. Sometimes, the adjuster is so busy telling the insured what he is going to do, that he doesn't let the insured talk. In many cases, if the adjuster listens, the insured will tell him how to settle the claim.

Conducting the Investigation

For an adjuster to perform a successful claim, the inspection needs to be thorough in order to accurately determine if the loss is covered. But perhaps just as important is the interaction he has with the insured as he inspects the damage. Depending on the size and scope of the loss, the adjuster may wish to take one of several different approaches.

If the loss is a small loss, say a water leak, the adjuster should let the insured show him the damages. Once he has seen the damages, he should confirm with the insured this is all of the damages. The adjuster does not want to get back to the office only to discover there were additional damages he did not see.

If the loss is a larger loss, say a grease fire, then the adjuster needs to walk and look before assessing the damages. By walking and looking, he will get an overall view of what will be involved in the claim. He will also learn about the insured. Are conditions neat and tidy or are conditions messy? Does the insured have nice expensive contents or do they appear to be second-hand contents? These are all factors that will assist the adjuster in settling the claim.

If the loss is more extensive, say a larger fire or extensive vandalism, it will probably be necessary for the adjuster to make a diagram of the risk. This is often made more difficult, though, because on a large loss the insured often wants to follow the adjuster around and talk as he is trying to work. Since the extent of the damages is large, and the insured has probably already explained what happened, the adjuster does not need the distraction. Yet the adjuster should not be rude and bluntly tell the insured to go away. One easy way to solve this problem is to give the insured something to do. If there are contents damaged in the loss, the insured can be asked to start an inventory. The adjuster can explain to the insured there will be certain information needed to settle the claim. If all is done in a nice orderly manner, the claim will become easier to settle. The adjuster can explain that by both doing their jobs, the insurer will get what it needs faster, and the insured will receive a check quicker. This will usually suffice. The adjuster can then make his diagram and take measurements of the rooms.

As part of the investigation, photographs of the damage should be taken. They are a way of showing the damages (or in some cases, the lack of damages). In some instances, the adjuster may not be sure about how to restore an item to its original condition. If this happens, the adjuster can take extra photographs, which can later be shown to a contractor or another adjuster to determine how to handle that item.

The adjuster should end his inspection by reviewing the damages with the insured. He should find out if the insured has any questions, and answer them.

Determining Coverage

To determine the loss settlement, it is the adjuster's responsibility to examine and answer three questions.

  1. Are the damages covered? The adjuster must be very familiar with and able to accurately interpret the insured's policy provisions. Damage must be assessed in light of those provisions, and decisions made accordingly. There are many cases where the insured has suffered a loss, but the damage is not covered by the policy. An example might be water leaking at a roof flashing with damage to the ceiling below. If an insured peril did not create an opening in the roof, there may be no coverage for the interior damages.
  2. How much will it cost to settle the loss? The adjuster's role includes determining the dollar amount of the loss. The settlement of the loss for an amount that seems fair is probably the insured's biggest concern. The adjuster must be skilled at making a fair and reasonable assessment.
  3. Is there any way to get money back? If another party possibly contributed to the loss, this must be determined in case the insurer wants to recoup the loss payment, or subrogate. Therefore, it is important for adjusters to have a working knowledge of residential construction. For example, if an insured has a leaking roof, did the roofer hired to make repairs complete the repairs properly? Are the improper repairs the cause of the leak, and thus the cause of the damage to the interior? Such questions need to be answered in order for the insurer to subrogate.

Scoping the Loss and Settling the Claim

When scoping the loss, the adjuster is determining what will need to be done to return the insured's property to its original condition. There are only five options.

  1. Replace. The item is damaged and must be replaced. For instance, the insulation has smoke and soot damage and will have to be replaced.
  2. Repair. The item is broken and can be fixed. As an example, there is a hole in the wall sheetrock. It can be repaired rather than having to replace the sheetrock.
  3. Paint or Refinish. Consider that a door was damaged and was replaced. The door would then be painted and refinished.
  4. Remove and Reset. For example, a vinyl floor in the kitchen is damaged and will have to be replaced. There is a stove on the vinyl floor. Before the vinyl can be replaced, the stove will have to be moved. After the vinyl floor is replaced, the stove will have to be put back. There will be a cost for moving the stove.
  5. Clean. Assume there is very light soot damage to the carpet. It is not necessary to replace the carpet. By cleaning the carpet, it will be returned to its original condition.

As in the earlier stage of investigation, the adjuster must maintain a good relationship with the insured. In order to settle a claim, the scope of work has to be agreed to. For example, if after a hailstorm the insured wants his roof replaced, and the adjuster says the insurer only owes for repairs, the scope is not agreed to; thus no settlement can be made.

Conclusion

The adjuster who presents himself in a professional manner, listens carefully to insureds and notes the information, and appropriately applies his technical expertise to loss situations will be successful in arranging satisfying settlements for insureds. Not only will this make insureds feel they are being treated well, but it should also ensure customer retention for the insurer.


Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

Advertisements
    
 
© 2000-2012 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.