Performance Based Seismic Design
October 2003
Performance Based Seismic Design is the seismic
design methodology of the future. It allows the design team to work together
to determine the appropriate levels of ground motion and Performance Objectives
for the building and the nonstructural components in order to meet the owner's
expectations.
by Nathan
C. Gould, D.Sc., P.E., S.E.
ABS Consulting
The primary focus of most model building codes, including the recently released
2003 International Building Code, is to ensure life safety. Continued operation
of a facility and reduction of economic losses associated with earthquake damage
to the facility are secondary considerations, if they're considered at all during
the design process. Economic losses sustained in previous earthquakes have highlighted
the need for a design methodology that allows the design team, which includes
the building owner, architect, and engineer, to understand and choose a desired
level of seismic performance for buildings and nonstructural components when
they are subjected to a specified level of ground motion. Performance Based
Seismic Design allows the design team to work together to determine the appropriate
levels of ground motion and Performance Objectives for the building and the
nonstructural components in order to meet the owner's expectations.
Current Building Code Design
Building code based seismic design has the following characteristics.
- The basic objective is life safety for the design level ground shaking.
- There are methods within the current model building codes and the new
International Building Code (IBC) to increase the detailing and/or seismic
design force requirements, but the resulting level of enhanced performance
is not explicitly defined.
- The design of the seismic load resisting system is based on a pseudo
seismic load, which is reduced from the actual load by a ductility factor
(the "R" value).
- The "R" value is used to reduce the design lateral load on the entire
building. There is only one "R" value for the entire building. Thus, the
same reduction is applied to beams, columns, braces, foundations, bolts,
welds, diaphragms, etc., independent of the element's ductility.
Performance Based Design
Over the past several years, federal guidelines were published which help
to facilitate the implementation of Performance Based Design with respect to
existing structures. FEMA 273, Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of
Buildings, which has subsequently been updated as FEMA 356, provides specific
performance objectives for both the building under consideration and the nonstructural
components associated with the building. While written for use with existing
structures, the Guidelines may also be used as the basis for the design of the
seismic force-resisting system for new structures.
Performance Based Seismic Design has the following distinguishing characteristics.
- Performance Based Seismic Design allows the owner, architect, and structural
engineer to choose both the appropriate level of ground shaking and the
chosen level of protection for that ground motion.
- Multiple levels of ground shaking can be evaluated, with a different
level of performance specified for each level of ground shaking.
- Target building performance levels range from Continued Operation, in
which the building and nonstructural components are expected to sustain
almost no damage in response to the design earthquake, to Collapse Prevention,
in which the structure should remain standing, but is extensively damaged.
- Specific ductility factors ("m" values) are specified for each component
of the seismic force-resisting system. The ductility factor varies depending
on the target building performance level, material type, and the relative
ductility of the component.
Below is a graphical representation of a performance objective matrix that
matches chosen earthquake hazard levels (y axis) with selected target building
performance levels (x axis). The three diagonal lines represent the performance
objectives for different groups of buildings. Group I is representative of a
basic commercial structure, while Groups II and III represent structures that
require a higher level of protection such as hospitals, fire stations, data
centers, key manufacturing facilities, etc.
Chart
1
The following design parameters are recommended by FEMA for ordinary buildings.
- Life Safety Performance Objective for
an event that has a 10 percent probability of occurring in the next 50 years.
- Collapse Prevention Performance Objective for an event that has a 2 percent probability of occurring in the next 50
years.
The following design parameters are recommended by FEMA for essential facilities
(buildings which are required to be operational after the design level seismic
event).
- Continued Operations Performance Objective for an event that has a 10 percent probability of occurring in the next
50 years.
- Life Safety Performance Objective for
an event which has a 2 percent probability of occurring in the next 50 years.
The estimated cost increments to raise the seismic design standard from the
typical building code to the FEMA Performance Based Seismic Design Guidelines,
expressed as a percentage of the total building construction cost, may be within
the following ranges.
Structural Lateral Load-Resisting System
Life Safety: 0%-0.50%
Immediate Occupancy: 0.25%-1.0%
Non-Structural Components
Life Safety: 0%-0.25%
Immediate Occupancy: 0.25%-0.50%
The estimated cost increment to incorporate Performance Based Seismic Design,
given that no seismic design was included originally, may be in the range of
2 to 5 percent of the total building cost.
Summary
Performance Based Seismic Design is the seismic design methodology of the
future. In addition to meeting the basic safety of objective of preventing loss
of life, Performance Based Seismic Design can provide a cost-effective means
to:
- Reduce earthquake financial loss due to structural and nonstructural
damage.
- Design a structure for a range of performance levels when subjected
to different levels of ground motion.
- Obtain minimum structural and nonstructural damage in a moderate seismic
event.
- Allow for continued operations in a structure following a design level
seismic event.
Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are
not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles
and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other
professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney,
accountant, or other qualified adviser.