Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Collapse Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Collapse Free Commercial Liability CommentaryFree Commercial Liability Commentary
Expand Additional Insured IssuesAdditional Insured Issues
Collapse EnvironmentalEnvironmental
Asbestos Damages Excluded under Property Policy (January 2012)
Insuring Completed Operations Pollution Risks (January 2012)
Emergency Response Costs in Pollution Liability Policies (August 2011)
Judgment Day Comes in Global Warming Litigation (February 2011)
Green Building Projects and Environmental Risk (January 2010)
No CGL Coverage for Chimney Repairs Due to Carbon Monoxide Leakage (January 2011)
CGL Pollution Exclusion Applies to Dust and Diesel Fumes (December 2010)
In a Year of Skepticism, Global Warming Is Still a Timely Topic (November 2010)
Mold from a Covered Concurrent Cause Still Excluded (November 2010)
Pollution Exclusion Found Inapplicable (May 2010)
An Update on Chinese Drywall Claims (April 2010)
CGL Policy Held To Cover Oil Spill Cleanup Costs (April 2010)
Mold Damage to Contractor's Nondefective Work Caused by Subcontractor May Be Covered under Prime Contractor's Umbrella Policy (January 2010)
CGL Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Injury from Carbon Monoxide Released from Heater (December 2009)
Insurer and Environmental Consultant Have No Duty To Warn of Mold (July 2009)
No Coverage in Homeowner's Policy for Mold Damage from Water Pipe Leak (May 2009)
Construction Debris Is Excluded Pollutant (February 2009)
Pollution Legal Liability Market Update (July 2008)
"Damages" under a 1973 CGL Insurance Policy (April 2008)
"Suits" under a 1973 CGL Insurance Policy (February 2008)
Common Law Exceptions to the 1973 "Owned Property" Exclusion (January 2008)
Epoxy Fumes Excluded by CGL Insurance (November 2007)
Contractors Pollution Liability Update (October 2007)
Allocating Losses under a 1973 CGL (September 2007)
Pollution Exclusion Bars Coverage for Damage Caused by Dirt and Rocks (March 2007)
Pollution Exclusions in CGL Policy Bars Coverage for Carbon Monoxide Poisoning (February 2007)
Naturally Occurring Hazards: They Can Be "Hazardous" to Your Contractors Pollution Liability Coverage (January 2007)
Mold Is Not Covered as an Ensuing Loss of Leaking Water (January 2007)
Promoting Insurance-Based Solutions to Brownfield Redevelopment Challenges (November 2006)
Financing Environmental Loss with Environmental Insurance (October 2006)
Premium Instead of Prayer Needed for Mold Coverage (July 2006)
Mold Litigation: Expert Testimony Required to Prove Causation (April 2006)
Subrogation and Intervention in Construction Defect Case Involving Water and Mold (February 2006)
Environmental Insurance Helps Create Sustainable Development Out of "Brownfields" (December 2005)
Absolute Pollution Exclusion in Contractors Policy Does Not Bar Coverage for Toxic Fume Injuries (November 2005)
Manganism? (October 2005)
Environmental Insurance as a FASB Fix (August 2005)
Silica Claim Barred by Total Pollution Exclusion in CGL Policy (August 2005)
Broad Pollution Exclusion Is Ambiguous: Lead Covered by Policy (May 2005)
Silica—The Next Environmental Issue (April 2005)
Whether Mold Cleanup Costs Are Covered Depends on Causation (April 2005)
Homeowners Policy Unambiguously Excluded Coverage for Mold (October 2004)
Environmental Liability Buyouts: A Developing Option (August 2004)
Development of Environmental Risk Profiles for Construction Firms (July 2004)
Managing the Environmental Risk from Subcontractors (May 2004)
Seven Tips on Mold Management Programs (November 2003)
Environmental Due Diligence: The Information Is Everywhere! (May 2003)
The New Reality of Risk: Environmental Toxic Torts (May 2003)
Insured Fixed-Price Contracts and Environmental Cleanup (April 2003)
Managing Environmental Liabilities through Contracts (January 2003)
Environmental Insurance Changes the Game for Commercial Lenders (December 2002)
Environmental Risk in Retail: Exposures and Solutions (October 2002)
The Environmental Risks of Residential Construction (October 2002)
A Mold Prevention Program (July 2002)
Navigating the U.S. Environmental Liability Market (Part 2) (March 2002)
Navigating the U.S. Environmental Liability Market (Part 1) (March 2002)
The Pitfalls of Accepting Contaminated Fill (March 2002)
Mold: The Newest Environmental Hazard (September 2001)
Conducting Proper Environment Risk Assessments (July 2001)
Introduction to ISO 14001 (April 2001)
Brownfield Redevelopment: A Risk versus Reward Proposition (December 2000)
Colleges and Universities: Changing Your "School of Thought" When It Comes to Environmental Liability (October 2000)
Lenders and Environmental Liability (September 2000)
There's a Fungus Among Us (June 2000)
The U.S. Environmental Liability Insurance Market (May 2000)
Hidden Environmental Exposures of the Construction Industry (March 2000)
Expand Liability InsuranceLiability Insurance
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Expand D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Expand Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Expand Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Expand Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Expand Claims, Caselaw, LegalClaims, Caselaw, Legal
Expand Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements
Support

Introduction to ISO 14001

April 2001

With the growth of the global economy, public awareness of differences between nations' environmental programs spurred the development of an international standard for environmental sensitivity. This article examines the ISO 14001 standard, certification, and scheduled revisions.

by Jeff Slivka
New Day Underwriting Managers LLC

ISO 14000, in simple terms, is the international roadmap for proactively managing the environmental aspects of business originated by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). The impetus for development of ISO 14000 is largely attributed to public concern. Politically oriented bodies, such as environmental advocacy organizations, watchdog groups, and the "green" parties that have established some footholds in government are urging companies to take responsibility for the effects of their business practices on the environment.

This pressure prompted a number of nations over the past 30 or so years to impose environmental regulatory controls that assuaged the local public. With the growth of the global economy in the 1990s, public awareness of differences between the environmental programs of various nations involved in production of consumer goods argued for the development of an international standard for environmental sensitivity.

ISO 14000 is not a single standard, but a series of standards and guidelines, all of which address some aspect of environmental management. Main topics addressed include:

  • Organization or Process Standards

    —Environmental Management Systems (EMS)

    —Environmental Auditing

    —Environmental Performance Evaluation

  • Product-Oriented Standards

    —Environmental Labeling

    —Life-Cycle Assessment

    —Environmental Aspects in Products

  • ISO 14001

    —EMS

The primary standard for the overall ISO 14000 program is ISO 14001, "Environmental Management Systems—Specification with Guidance for Use." This standard presents the required auditable components necessary to achieve ISO certification of an Environmental Management System (EMS). It is not a straitjacket; the wording of the standard leaves a great deal of latitude for corporations to accommodate their companies' unique characteristics into their EMS.

The basic requirements of ISO are that the EMS incorporate the following principles:

  • Environmental Policy containing the commitment of management to regulatory compliance, continual improvement and prevention of pollution. This policy is to be made available to the public.
  • Planning to identify the environmental aspects associated with the organization's operations, set objectives and develop a management plan.
  • Implementation and Operation addressing responsibilities, training, communications—both internal and external, documentation, document control, operational control and emergency preparedness/response.
  • Checking and Corrective Action that measures and records achievement against the planning goals, identifies and tracks correction of deficiencies, and reviews the effectiveness of the EMS.
  • Management Review to monitor the program and make corrections when appropriate.

The ISO approach to an EMS requires the involvement of all corporate resources as opposed to a few individuals who are relied on by many existing EMSs. This total involvement, when properly planned and executed, draws ideas and participation from the entire staff to solve a corporation's identified environmental impact issues. It is important to note that ISO 14001 is not a regulatory compliance standard. Rather, it focuses on a corporation's commitment to its stakeholders, which include the regulatory community. However, assessment of compliance status is left to the applicable regulatory community.

The Benefits of the ISO Certification

The obvious benefits of an EMS include the positive public response received by a company that is in tune with the environment. Showing the community that the company is managing its environmental matters will have a tremendous impact not only with the people in the community, but also with regulatory agencies. Additionally, the simple fact that an EMS can effectively reduce or even prevent environmental disasters from ever occurring directly impacts the company's bottom line.

Other bottom line benefits of the EMS are less obvious, but no less important. For instance, we have seen a large number of mergers and acquisitions over the past few years. Evaluating the worth of a company without an EMS or way of quantifying material environmental expense may be tricky. In the United States, publicly traded companies are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to disclose all environmental liabilities and material environmental expenses associated with future cleanup in the form 10K. An EMS can effectively do this for many companies. Without it, a company could easily subject itself to unwanted environmental liability.

As environmental protection and preservation continue to gain momentum across the globe, it is expected that customers will use ISO as the standard for dealing with environmental management and require certification in doing business. Companies that take a proactive approach will benefit and probably see certification as a competitive advantage.

Lastly, it is expected that ISO 14001 will be a prerequisite for attaining ISO 9001 recertification. For those companies that have already obtained ISO 9001 certification and/or follow Total Quality Management (TQM) principles, ISO 14001 certification is the next logical step.

ISO 14000 is an internationally recognized standard. To date, there have been close to 20,000 companies worldwide that have voluntarily established an EMS and received ISO 14001 certification. Interestingly enough, the United States is not a leader in this area. At first thought, it may be difficult to understand why we "lag behind" on such an issue that has gained great public awareness in our country. However, keep in mind that ISO 14000 is an internationally recognized, voluntary standard. In the United States, our compliance standards far exceed those under ISO 14000.

So, what benefit is ISO 14000 to U.S.-based companies? For companies that have not established a formal EMS, ISO 14000 is a good standard to follow. It also serves as a "comparative" standard to what countries are doing on a global basis. The U.S. companies that benefit most from following ISO 14000 are those that conduct business globally. For these companies, ISO 14000 provides an established standard they can follow and, more importantly, the certainty that others with certification are managing their environmental matters. This is important when you consider the mergers and acquisitions taking place worldwide.

Revisions

ISO is currently in the process of revising 14001, but no formal process will be established until 2003. This new document will not contain additional requirements for certification. Any changes to the existing document will address two major areas:

  • Compatibility with the new ISO 9000 quality management systems series; and
  • Clarification of text within the standard to help users better understand its requirements.

The simplicity of these changes will not affect the thousands of companies in various stages of implementation and may actually attract other companies looking for guidance on environmental management.

For more specific information on ISO 14000, contact CEEM International Environmental Systems at www.CEEM.com.


Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

Advertisements
    
 
© 2000-2012 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.