Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Expand Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Collapse D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Collapse Free Expert CommentaryFree Expert Commentary
Collapse Employment LawEmployment Law
New EEOC Guidance on Waivers of Discrimination Claims (August 2009)
Do Employee Layoffs Equal Litigation? (April 2009)
Should Employers "Google" Applicants? (February 2009)
Eleventh Circuit Court Requires Comparables "Similarly Situated in All Respects" (December 2008)
Recent Employee-Friendly Court Decisions (September 2008)
Downsizing Risk Management: RFOA as an Affirmative Defense (August 2008)
"Associational" Discrimination Claims a Growing Concern for Employers (May 2008)
New York Steps Up Employment Compliance Oversight (February 2008)
Age Discrimination Legal Update (December 2007)
States Expand Employee Protection to Families of Servicemen (August 2007)
NY Court Refuses To Extend FLSA Enterprise Liability to Nonprofits (June 2007)
Special Rules on Release Agreements for Workers Raise Questions and Create Litigation Risks (March 2007)
How Companies Are Bracing for EEOC Class Action Initiative Goals (February 2007)
Responding to an Unauthorized Breach of Electronic Personal Information (November 2006)
Complying with the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986: A Challenging Task (October 2006)
"Simple Logic" Precludes Ambiguity in Offer Letter's at-Will Clause (September 2006)
Supreme Court Loosens Standard in Retaliation Lawsuits (July 2006)
2005 Workplace Survey Shows Decrease in Lawsuits (June 2006)
Wage-Hour Update: Class Actions on the Rise (March 2006)
Taylor v. Progress Energy Affects FMLA Rights (December 2005)
The Changing Definition of Protected Concerted Activity (June 2005)
Supreme Court Allows Age Discrimination Claims Based on Disparate Impact (April 2005)
California Enacts Sexual Harassment Training Statute (December 2004)
Visa Revalidation Process Terminated by the Department of State (August 2004)
New Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Proposed (May 2004)
Time To Reevaluate Employee Bonus and Incentive Plans? (April 2004)
Department of Labor Issues Proposed Regulations on COBRA Notices (March 2004)
Supreme Court To Consider Employer Policies (December 2003)
ADA Requirements in "Direct Threat" Determination (August 2003)
Labor Department Proposes Wage Changes (June 2003)
The Dangers of "Post-Injury" Drug and Alcohol Testing (February 2003)
New York Extends Civil Rights Protections to Gays and Lesbians (January 2003)
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002: Expanded Whistleblower Protection (November 2002)
Managing RIFs during Tough Economic Times (October 2002)
ADA Doesn't Require Employer To Violate Its Seniority Policy (May 2002)
Supreme Court Clarifies EEOC's Role in Arbitration Disputes (February 2002)
Failure To Train about Age Discrimination Results in Employer Liability (January 2002)
Military Leave Rights: Obligations for Employers (December 2001)
Compelling Arbitration of Employee Claims under the Federal Arbitration Act (June 2001)
The New OSHA Ergonomics Program Standard (January 2001)
Top 10 Best Employment Practices for the New New Economy (December 2000)
Nonunion Employees Gain Right to Representation during Investigations (August 2000)
Supreme Court Lowers the Bar in Proving Discrimination (July 2000)
Leave and Reassignment under the ADA (March 2000)
Expand Healthcare Professional Liability InsuranceHealthcare Professional Liability Insurance
Expand Intellectual Property LawIntellectual Property Law
Expand Professional, D&O, and Fiduciary LiabilityProfessional, D&O, and Fiduciary Liability
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Expand Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Expand Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Expand Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Expand Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements
Support

Military Leave Rights: Obligations for Employers

December 2001

Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act guarantees the rights of military service members to take a leave of absence from their civilian jobs for active military service and to return to their jobs with accrued seniority and other employment protections. Paul Siegel provides the details.

by Paul J. Siegel, Esq.
Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler & Krupman

In 1994 statutory reemployment rights for military members were revised with the signing of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA), 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301-4333. Like its predecessors, USERRA guarantees the rights of military service members to take a leave of absence from their civilian jobs for active military service and to return to their jobs with accrued seniority and other employment protections.

Employer Obligations to Employees Requesting Military Leave

In general, employers must provide the following to covered employees who are not in temporary positions:

  1. An unpaid leave of absence for a period not to exceed 5 years to perform any form of military service, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, called or activated, such as being placed on active duty, for annual training, and for training weekends. A cautionary note regarding the leave being unpaid: under the Fair Labor Standards Act: if an exempt employee works any part of a week, the salary for the entire week must be paid. Therefore, if an exempt employee works any part of a week, then spends the rest of the week in military service, the salary for the entire week must be paid. However, in that case, the amount of the military pay for the week may be offset against the salary.
  2. While on leave, the employee is entitled to those rights and benefits not determined by seniority and generally provided to individuals of similar status on a leave of absence.
  3. Upon return from leave, reinstatement to the position that the employee would have held if his or her continuous employment had not been interrupted (the "escalator principle"). This obligation includes making reasonable effort to train the employee to make him or her qualified for the escalator position. If the employee cannot be made qualified, the employee must be returned to the position he or she occupied when going out on leave.
  4. Upon return from leave, all seniority and seniority-based rights and benefits as if the employee had remained continuously employed. Typical benefits covered under USERRA would include vacation allowances, pension credit and 401(k) contributions.
  5. Continuation of medical benefits under the same terms and conditions as when actively employed if military service is less than 31 days.
  6. Continuation of medical benefits during the leave under terms similar to those of COBRA.
  7. Protection from discharge upon return to work except for cause for a period of time depending on the length of military service.

Employee Obligations to Employers under USERRA

To be entitled to these benefits, employees must do the following:

  1. Give timely notice of their need to perform military service except as required by military necessity or unless impossible or unreasonable.
  2. Apply for reemployment within a set time after release from military service. In the case of service of less than 31 days, the individual must normally return to work on the first workday after release from military service. In the case of service lasting between 31 and 180 days, the individual must normally reapply within 14 days after completing active service. In the case of service lasting more than 180 days, the individual must normally reapply within 90 days after the completion of service.
  3. Be released from active military service under honorable conditions (with an honorable or general discharge).

Other Issues

USERRA also prohibits discrimination against service members in employment and provides training obligations for employers under certain circumstances. Employers do not have to reemploy a returning service member if "the employer's circumstances have so changed as to make such reemployment impossible or unreasonable." In addition, employees hired for a brief, nonrecurring period without reasonable expectation that employment will continue indefinitely or for a significant time are not entitled to reinstatement rights.

It should be noted that some states provide additional rights to returning employees. Those rights may be more extensive than those under USERRA.

Frequently Asked Questions

What if an employee volunteers for military service? USERRA does not distinguish between volunteers and those ordered to perform military service. Employees are protected regardless of whether they volunteered or were ordered involuntarily to active duty.

Must an employer pay an employee while he or she is on active duty? USERRA does not require employers to pay employees while on military leave. Some employers voluntarily have policies that make up the difference between military pay and allowances and an employee's regular pay. Employers should review such policies to ensure that the extent of these obligations is consistent with current business objectives. If an exempt employee works any part of a week, the salary for the entire week must be paid. Therefore, if an exempt employee works any part of a week, then spends the rest of the week in military service, the salary for the entire week must be paid. However, in that case, the amount of the military pay for the week may be offset against the salary.

Can an employer require an employee to use earned vacation time while performing military service? No, employees are entitled use to earned vacation while on leave but generally may not be required to do so.

What is the "escalator principle?" Employers must treat returning service members as if they had remained continuously employed for purposes of the position as well as pay and benefits to which they return. For example, if similarly employed individuals who joined the company in 1996 currently earn $15 per hour, then a similarly situated returning service member who joined the company in 1996 should be paid $15 per hour even if he or she had been on active duty for extended periods during that time. As another example, if an apprentice electrician left the company for active military duty in 1999 and returned in 2001, the employee might be entitled to a position as a journeyman electrician.

What about employees serving in the National Guard? National Guard members sometimes perform federal service (e.g., during annual training) and sometimes perform state service (e.g., during some disasters). USERRA only applies to National Guard members performing federal service, but many state laws afford similar protection to individuals performing state service. To determine compliance obligations under these circumstances, employers should obtain a copy of the employee's orders and consult with an attorney.

Is there a limit on the length of military service under the USERRA protections? Under USERRA, employees are only entitled to protection during cumulative periods of military leave of up to 5 years, but there are many exceptions to this general limitation. For example, leave time for active duty by order of a Presidential declaration would normally NOT count as part of the 5-year period.


Please note: This summary is provided for informational purposes only and is not rendered as legal advice. Employers should consult counsel of their own choosing for advice about a specific situation or problem. For more information concerning employer obligations under USERRA or state military leave laws, you may contact the following Jackson Lewis attorneys: Michael Caples, in the Jackson Lewis San Francisco office, at (415) 394-9400; Shawn Kee in the Stamford, Connecticut, office, (203) 961-0404; Robert Sneed in the Greenville, South Carolina, office, (864) 232-7000, or the Jackson Lewis attorney with whom you regularly work.


Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

© 2000-2009 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.