Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse IRMI OnlineIRMI Online
Expand How To Use IRMI OnlineHow To Use IRMI Online
My Paid Publications
Expand What's NewWhat's New
Expand DashboardsDashboards
Expand Commercial Liability InformationCommercial Liability Information
Expand Commercial Property InformationCommercial Property Information
Expand Commercial Auto InformationCommercial Auto Information
Expand D&O, PL, E&O, EPLI InformationD&O, PL, E&O, EPLI Information
Expand Workers Compensation InformationWorkers Compensation Information
Classifications and Cross-References
Expand Risk Mgt. and Multiline InformationRisk Mgt. and Multiline Information
Collapse Risk Finance InformationRisk Finance Information
Collapse Free Expert CommentaryFree Expert Commentary
Expand CaptivesCaptives
Expand Quantitative MethodsQuantitative Methods
Expand Risk FinanceRisk Finance
Collapse RM for Financial ManagersRM for Financial Managers
Risk Management Services Report Card (July 2009)
Insurance Value—Not Price—Matters (June 2008)
Pay for Results (June 2007)
Government Bailout or Catastrophe "Insurance"? (November 2006)
Insurance ... The Other Side of the Chinese Wall (July 2006)
The Opportunity Cost of Price Shopping (September 2005)
A Broker's Value (February 2005)
Claims—Do You Recognize Your Policy? (March 2004)
The Driver: It's Price, Not Risk (July 2003)
The Importance of Contingent Business Interruption (August 2002)
The Insurance Business Is Not For Sissies! (February 2002)
So, Where Do Insurers Go after 9/11? (September 2001)
Insurers' Marketing Myopia (June 2001)
Insurance Prices Are Up—So Why Aren't Underwriters Smiling? (March 2001)
Linking Financial Services—A Good Idea? (January 2001)
E-Supply—Opportunity and Risk (September 2000)
Change ... Are You Ready for More? (June 2000)
Insurance—A CFO's Perspective (March 2000)
Expand Construction InformationConstruction Information
Expand Personal Lines InformationPersonal Lines Information
Expand Insurance IndustryInsurance Industry
Expand Glossary of Insurance & Risk Management TermsGlossary of Insurance & Risk Management Terms
Expand SearchSearch
Terms of Use
Privacy Statement
System Requirements
Support

Insurers' Marketing Myopia

June 2001

Don't insurers realize the value of being customer focused instead of product focused? Yes, but they are hampered by a lack of direct access to clients, development of intellectual capital, and consistency on improving the bottom line. Learn more in this insightful article.

by Gary J. Bausom
Bausom & Associates, Inc.

Don't insurance companies know about the value of being customer focused versus being product focused? Yes, they do, but they face a number of obstacles. These obstacles include lack of the following: direct access to clients, development of intellectual capital, and consistency on how to improve the "bottom line."

Access

Brokers and agents limit access to clients. The distribution system was designed to create efficiency in achieving desired premium volumes. With any salesperson, when rewards are predicated on volume, quality of business can take a backseat. The problem is not with the salesperson but with the individuals establishing and offering the rewards.

The brokerage business has changed notably in the past 5 years. Beyond the numerous merger and acquisition consolidations, the culture has changed to an even greater extent. Seasoned individuals, who understood their firm's culture and occasionally bent corporate protocol for the sake of quality client service and maintenance of highly trusted relationships with underwriters, have been forced out or retired early. They have been replaced with young, energetic people with a good deal of potential who are less costly. However, these new people lack the experience, relationships, and mentoring necessary to adequately serve clients, especially the risk management accounts and their management groups.

Today, large brokerage firms are organized and serve customers on a functional or "silo" basis. Other than the most senior brokerage firm executives, few have an overview of a client's entire account. This organizational approach is designed to prevent brokers from leaving the firm and having clients follow them out the door.

Meanwhile, the gap between insurance companies and clients has gotten considerably wider.

Intellectual Capital

If you roll the clock back 10 years, full-service 900 pound gorillas thought Charles Schwab was a joke. We know who is smiling today. Why? Schwab provided basic access to the market at low cost and built trust with their clients by delivering, as represented, every time. Today, Schwab has expanded by attracting quality talent, who advise clients with the support of internal and external research.

If insurance companies have the financial capital, they are the ones with the greatest concern over preservation and growth. Intellectual capital is the driver for maintaining current business and attracting new business, which will assure preservation and growth of financial capital.

Acquiring Intellectual Capital

Insurance companies should direct their marketing efforts toward clients who demonstrate leadership qualities and have the support of their management. So, what does this mean in client terms?

In the insurance industry, intellectual capital seems to be reduced to wrangling over price. Most risk managers have focused almost solely on the spot price of insurance. Risk managers can better explain short-term premium variances than they can explain the failure to collect, or delay in collecting, a $100 million claim. Most risk managers have not been on the job long enough to have experienced a large claim, and perhaps they have plans to move on in the near future.

Risk managers who want to advance rapidly will need to anticipate trends in the market, ask their corporate leadership group for assistance in managing vendors, and, above all, educate their management to judge them on a set of established criteria rather than changes in the level of insurance premiums. The following are some examples.

  • If management has been forewarned concerning trends in the insurance industry, they are less likely to be surprised when changes occur.
  • Risk mangers that are held accountable for defined objectives should request the authority to select their teams both internally and externally. (When senior management receives a call from a vendor, the response should be, "That is interesting but I do not make those decisions, our risk manager does.")
  • While a purchasing manager may be judged on cost per unit (including carrying costs), risk managers need to be evaluated on their knowledge and expertise in advising management on risk and related actions. (Reporters from the New York Times and Wall Street Journal are valued and paid for their knowledge, insights, and effective communication skills, not for the number of words written per month. What qualities will senior management look for when adding a new member to their team?)

So where should the leaders in risk management focus their attention? From insurers they seek the following:

  1. Credit quality
  2. Capacity, net and treaty
  3. Individual accountability, one or two people
  4. Underwriters who understand their risks, businesses, and measures of success
  5. Delivery, as represented, every time

How prepared are insurance companies to be leaders processing intellectual capital for the purpose of effectively dealing with clients and directing the sales channel? If the insurers and the sales channel are not working as allies, no one wins, including the client.

Profitability

Some insurance companies seem to send mixed messages to their underwriters. In the first half of a year, the focus is on top line revenue, while during the last half of the year, underwriters are emphasizing the bottom line, or vice versa.

Attracting quality accounts and retaining them will achieve sustainable profitability. Noted experts James Heskett and Earl Sasser of the Harvard Business School, in their book Service Quality, have demonstrated that it requires 3 years after acquiring a new account to break even. Obtaining and retaining quality accounts will improve profitability and its consistency far better than a "shotgun" approach to increasing written premium.

Retaining accounts requires business relationships that support the partners and make them look good. It also requires personal accountability, like "standing up" and admitting, "It was my fault, and here is what I will do to make it right." A business relationship has to go well beyond a client account number and a receivable.

Profit margins will be notably better where there are matches between clients and underwriters who are both seeking and delivering added value, compared to clients looking for the "best" spot price. If an account is won based on price alone, it will also be lost based on price.

Action Items

What are the next steps for insurance companies?

  • Develop and acquire the people with intellectual capital.
  • Select industry groups to study.
  • Invest time with clients.
  • Redefine working relationships with sales channels.
  • Invest in channel improvements.

Or

  • Maintain the status quo … and accept a reduced role and even lower profitability!

Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are not necessarily held by the author's employer or IRMI. Expert Commentary articles and other IRMI Online content do not purport to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.

© 2000-2009 International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI). All rights reserved.