ISO Files Auto Terrorism Exclusion for Commercial Auto Program
May 2002
This article examines the new ISO war, military
action, and terrorism exclusions applicable to the business auto, business auto
physical damage, motor carrier, truckers, and garage coverage forms and which
states have approved them.
by Maureen McLendon
IRMI
Insurance Services Offices, Inc. (ISO), filed two optional commercial auto
exclusionary endorsements in January of this year. The endorsements were filed
in all jurisdictions except Guam, Hawaii, and Massachusetts. As of May 17, 2002,
the filings have been approved in 26 jurisdictions and disapproved in 1 (Virginia).
See Figure A for a listing of states that have approved these filings.
| Alabama Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
Delaware
Dist. of Columbia
Idaho
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
|
Michigan Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Nebraska
New Hampshire
New Mexico
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
|
Oklahoma Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Utah
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
|
The war, military action and terrorism exclusion (CA 23 37) applies to the
business auto, business auto physical damage, motor carrier, and truckers coverage
forms. The endorsement replaces and expands the war exclusion under:
- liability coverage
- physical damage coverage
- trailer interchange coverage
- auto medical payments coverage
- personal injury protection (PIP) coverage, if the PIP coverage contains
a war exclusion
The endorsement adds an exclusion for:
- garagekeepers coverage endorsement or
- garagekeepers coverage—customers' sound receiving equipment endorsement
- uninsured/underinsured motorists coverage, and
- PIP coverage, if the PIP coverage does not already have a war exclusion
The war, military action and terrorism exclusion—garage coverage form (CA
23 38) applies to the garage coverage form. The endorsement replaces and expands
the war exclusion under:
- liability coverage
- physical damage coverage
- auto medical payments
- garage locations and operations medical payments coverage, and
- personal injury protection coverage (PIP), if the PIP coverage contains
a war exclusion
The endorsement adds an exclusion for:
- garagekeepers coverage or
- garagekeepers coverage—customers' sound receiving equipment endorsement
- personal injury liability coverage—garages endorsement or
- personal and advertising injury liability coverage under the broadened
coverage-garages endorsement
- uninsured/underinsured motorists coverage, and
- PIP coverage, if the PIP coverage does not already have a war exclusion
The endorsements are patterned after the commercial general liability (CGL)
policy endorsements (please refer to The ISO Terrorism
Exclusions: Background and Analysis on IRMI.com for a full discussion) that
have already been approved in a majority of states. In general, this change
expands application of the war exclusion beyond contractual liability to include
acts of terrorism. The term terrorism is defined as:
"Terrorism" means activities against persons, organizations, or property
of any nature:
- That involve the following or preparation for the following:
- Use or threat of force or violence; or
- Commission or threat of a dangerous act; or
- Commission or threat of an act that interferes with or disrupts
an electronic, information, or mechanical system; and
- When one or both of the following applies;
- The effect is to intimidate or coerce a government or the civilian
population or any segment thereof, or to disrupt any segment of the
economy; or
- It appears that the intent is to intimidate or coerce a government,
or to further political, ideological, religious, social or economic
objectives or to express (or express opposition to) a philosophy or
ideology.
Quantitative thresholds—insured property damage of $25 million, or death
or serious physical injury to 50 or more persons—are set forth to determine
when the terrorism exclusion is triggered. Multiple incidents of terrorism that
occur within a 72-hour period and appear to be carried out in concert or to
have a related purpose or common leadership are considered to be one incident.
In conjunction with these endorsement filings, a new manual rule (111) was
introduced that gives insurers two options: attach the applicable endorsement
and apply ISO loss costs or insurer rates; or refer to insurer for rating. The
implication, of course, is that when the endorsements are not attached, the
insurer will apply some kind of debit rating for the exposure.
Opinions expressed in Expert Commentary articles are those of the author and are
not necessarily held by the author’s employer or IRMI. This article does not purport
to provide legal, accounting, or other professional advice or opinion. If such advice
is needed, consult with your attorney, accountant, or other qualified adviser.